A practical analysis of when exclusive international jurisdiction agreements designating foreign courts become unenforceable in South Korea, based on Supreme Court and lower court precedents.
South Korea Supreme Court Decision 2025Da211111 limits the Article 797 maritime carrier cap to actual sea-carriage segments. Korean attorney explains.
Can a Korean design right holder be sued for damages after platform takedown when the registration is later invalidated? Court precedents from South Korea explained.
Two April 2026 Supreme Court of Korea rulings split outcomes at the same steel mill. A Korean lawyer explains the five-factor dispatch test and audit priorities.
When a freight forwarder issues a house bill of lading in South Korea, it acquires carrier status without losing forwarder status. This post explains the dual status doctrine, limitation period differences, and cargo claim strategy under Korean law.
South Korea’s per-package liability limit applies even to seaworthiness breaches. Learn when a carrier’s own intentional or reckless conduct displaces the cap under Korean maritime law.
When a South Korean bill of lading lists only outer packages, which unit governs carrier liability? A practical guide to per-package limitation under Korean Commercial Act Article 797, based on Supreme Court precedent.
South Korea’s Supreme Court confirmed in 2026 that websites lacking alternative text violate disability discrimination law. Learn what your company must do now.
A shareholder holding 3% or more of shares can petition a South Korean court to dismiss a director when the shareholders’ meeting rejects removal. Learn the requirements, case law, and litigation strategy.
South Korea’s Supreme Court ruled a destination freight forwarder liable for passing a Master D/O to the importer without verifying D/P payment. Attorney analysis of the 2025 ruling and key lessons for exporters.
