Skip to content
Atlas Legal Blog

Atlas Legal Blog

  • Atlas Home
  • About Us
  • Corporate/InternationalExpand
    • Antitrust, Competition&Subcontract
    • Bankruptcy
    • Contract Review
    • Corporate Counseling
    • Corporate Disputes
    • Employment & Labor
    • Int’l Transactions&Disputes
    • Intellectual Property
    • Logistics & Maritime
    • Management Disputes
    • Overseas Investment
    • Trade Secrets
    • Unfair Competition
    • 미분류
  • White Collar CrimeExpand
    • White-Collar Crime
  • Civil/Administrative
  • Kor Blog
  • Contact
Atlas Legal Blog
Atlas Legal Blog
  • Intellectual Property

    Who Owns the Copyright in a Work-for-Hire Contract in South Korea? Key Court Rulings Explained

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 15일2026년 07월 30일

    Under South Korean copyright law, copyright in commissioned works vests in the contractor by default. Landmark rulings on software, websites, advertising, and joint works analyzed.

    Read More Who Owns the Copyright in a Work-for-Hire Contract in South Korea? Key Court Rulings ExplainedContinue

  • Corporate Disputes

    False Advertising in Korean Real Estate Pre-Sales: 10 Supreme Court Cases

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 13일2026년 07월 30일

    South Korean Supreme Court rulings on false advertising in real estate pre-sales — 10 cases analyzed, including the 2026 sales agent ruling. Damages, causation, and key factors explained.

    Read More False Advertising in Korean Real Estate Pre-Sales: 10 Supreme Court CasesContinue

  • Corporate Counseling | Corporate Disputes

    Director’s Duty of Oversight & Internal Control in South Korea: Four Supreme Court Rulings

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 11일2026년 07월 30일

    Can a CEO in South Korea be liable for a cartel they never knew about? Atlas Legal analyzes four landmark Supreme Court rulings on director oversight and internal control obligations.

    Read More Director’s Duty of Oversight & Internal Control in South Korea: Four Supreme Court RulingsContinue

  • Corporate Transactions

    What Happens When Representations and Warranties Are Breached in a South Korean M&A Contract? Four Supreme Court Decisions Analyzed

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 07일2026년 07월 30일

    When representations and warranties are breached in a Korean M&A contract, the buyer may claim damages even with prior knowledge of the breach. Four Supreme Court decisions (2017Da6108, 2012Da64253, 2019Da285226, 2018Da285144) analyzed for practical deal structuring.

    Read More What Happens When Representations and Warranties Are Breached in a South Korean M&A Contract? Four Supreme Court Decisions AnalyzedContinue

  • Employment & Labor

    Construction Equipment Operators Are Not “Third Parties” Under South Korea’s Workers’ Comp Subrogation Rules

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 06일2026년 07월 30일

    Korea’s Supreme Court en banc (2022Da214040, Jan. 22, 2026) held that construction equipment operators working under an employer’s direction are not ‘third parties’ under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and cannot be sued for subrogation by KCOMWEL. A landmark ruling overturning prior precedent.

    Read More Construction Equipment Operators Are Not “Third Parties” Under South Korea’s Workers’ Comp Subrogation RulesContinue

  • Int'l Transactions & Disputes

    International Lis Pendens in South Korea: Can a Korean Court Dismiss?

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 05일2026년 07월 30일

    Under South Korean law, a Korean court cannot dismiss a lawsuit simply because identical proceedings are pending abroad. Analysis of Seoul High Court 2023Na2056133 and Article 11 of Korea’s Revised Private International Law Act.

    Read More International Lis Pendens in South Korea: Can a Korean Court Dismiss?Continue

  • Corporate Disputes | Trade Secrets

    How South Korean Courts Calculate Trade Secret Damages: The ₩5.76 Billion Nexon v. Iron Mace Verdict

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 05월 04일2026년 07월 30일

    Seoul High Court 2025Na206557 and Supreme Court 2026Da200492 set the benchmark for trade secret damages in South Korea. Learn how the three-variable formula—protection period, marginal profit rate, and contribution rate—produced a ₩5.76 billion award.

    Read More How South Korean Courts Calculate Trade Secret Damages: The ₩5.76 Billion Nexon v. Iron Mace VerdictContinue

  • Corporate Disputes

    Elderly Private Fund Damages in South Korea: Court Ruling

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 04월 30일2026년 07월 30일

    South Korean court ordered full compensation to a 73-year-old housewife sold a high-risk private fund. Atlas Legal analyzes suitability principle and duty to explain.

    Read More Elderly Private Fund Damages in South Korea: Court RulingContinue

  • Int'l Transactions&Disputes | Logistics & Maritime

    When Are Foreign Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses Invalid in South Korea? Case Law Analysis

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 04월 27일2026년 08월 05일

    A practical analysis of when exclusive international jurisdiction agreements designating foreign courts become unenforceable in South Korea, based on Supreme Court and lower court precedents.

    Read More When Are Foreign Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses Invalid in South Korea? Case Law AnalysisContinue

  • White Collar Crime | White-Collar Crime

    Who Is a Personal Data Controller in South Korea? Four Supreme Court Cases

    By법무법인 아틀라스 2026년 04월 24일2026년 07월 30일

    South Korea’s Supreme Court defined personal data controller liability in four landmark PIPA rulings. Learn the legal test and what it means for your business.

    Read More Who Is a Personal Data Controller in South Korea? Four Supreme Court CasesContinue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 26 Next PageNext
Atlas Legal
B-2901, 323 Incheon Tower-daero, Yeonsu-gu,
Incheon, Republic of Korea
T. +82-32-864-8300 F. +82-32-864-8301
E. info@atlaw.kr
©Copyright 2019 Atlas Legal. All Rights Reserved.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • Atlas Home
  • About Us
  • Corporate/International
    • Antitrust, Competition&Subcontract
    • Bankruptcy
    • Contract Review
    • Corporate Counseling
    • Corporate Disputes
    • Employment & Labor
    • Int’l Transactions&Disputes
    • Intellectual Property
    • Logistics & Maritime
    • Management Disputes
    • Overseas Investment
    • Trade Secrets
    • Unfair Competition
    • 미분류
  • White Collar Crime
    • White-Collar Crime
  • Civil/Administrative
  • Kor Blog
  • Contact