Unjust Enrichment in South Korea: Equity Limits
Courts may not reduce unjust enrichment in South Korea owed by a land occupier on equity grounds absent special circumstances, the Supreme Court held.
-
-
Owner-Occupancy Renewal Refusal in South Korea
A South Korean landlord who refuses renewal to move in, then re-lets the home, owes the tenant damages unless the reason was unforeseeable and unavoidable.
-
Key Money Recovery and Excessive Rent in South Korea
A landlord’s rent demand to a tenant’s successor in South Korea is judged against existing and fair rent, the Supreme Court of Korea held.
-
Principal Contractor Liability in South Korea
Principal contractor liability in South Korea turns on control over site hazards, not on chairing progress meetings, the Supreme Court of Korea held.
-
Prepaid Interest Deduction in South Korea
Under South Korea’s Interest Limitation Act, excess prepaid interest reduces the agreed principal before deduction, not the net amount received.
-
Statute of Limitations Waiver and Seizure in South Korea
The Supreme Court of Korea abolished the 58-year-old presumption that acknowledging a time-barred debt waives the limitations defense, and confirmed that a seizure finding no attachable claim stops tolling on service.
-
IPO Penalty Clauses in South Korea
In South Korea a listing covenant is an obligation of means, not result. The Supreme Court set out when a failed IPO triggers a penalty payment.
-
KRW 2.1 Billion Left in Five Days — Why the Bank Owed Nothing
When a deceived customer transfers the money themselves, how far does a Korean bank’s liability go? A KRW 2 billion claim dismissed, and when a bank is liable.
-
The Register Was Clean When You Bought It — Why the Mortgage Came Back
A mortgage cancelled by a forged power of attorney is void in South Korea, and a later buyer must consent to its restoration even in good faith.
-
A Loan Taken Out in Your Name in South Korea — When You Do Not Have to Repay It
Under South Korean law, a non-face-to-face loan obtained through identity theft does not bind you where the lender failed to verify identity properly. Cheongju District Court 2024Na57532, and two Supreme Court judgments issued on the same day reached opposite results.