Atlas Legal received a not guilty judgement in a trade secret leak case.
News
- winning case
Atlas Legal successfully defended app developers who created and distributed an auxiliary application to enhance the usability of delivery apps used by riders. The defendants were acquitted in both the first instance and appellate courts.
- winning case
Atlas Legal successfully represented shareholder X of Company A in a lawsuit that compelled CEO Y to return all compensation (including monthly salary, bonuses, and all other forms) and corporate card usage amounts to Company A.
Additionally, Z, who was the auditor of Company A, was held jointly liable and ordered to return Y’s compensation to Company A in solidarity with Y.
Please click here for details.
- Counseling
The Green Climate Fund (GCF) staff are awarded certain privileges and immunities to ensure the independent and effective operation of the Fund. These privileges and immunities are designed to protect the Fund from being subject to the jurisdiction of the countries where it operates, which includes immunity from legal action against its assets or personnel while undertaking official functions. The privileges and immunities are not for the personal benefit of individuals but are granted in the interest of the GCF
- Counseling
Atlas Legal recently advised a company that it could receive substantial financial support from a local government. The main basis for this advice was the principle of protection of legitimate expectations under administrative law.
The case involved a situation where the company started a business believing in the local government’s promise of support, but the local government did not provide the promised funds.
K&P Law Firm reviewed the requirements for protection of legitimate expectations and concluded that the case met all the requirements.
- winning case
At Atlas Legal, we recently represented Plaintiffs A and B in a complex legal dispute that revolved around the dissolution of a business partnership and distributions from the dissolution. This case highlights the intricacies of partnership law and the critical importance of clear communication and proper disclosure within business collaborations.