{"id":71,"date":"2025-07-18T06:37:38","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T06:37:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=71"},"modified":"2026-05-03T21:26:13","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T21:26:13","slug":"attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/","title":{"rendered":"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#8217;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ATLAS_SEO_BLOCK_START --><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#article\",\"headline\":\"[Attorney Taejin Kim's Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act\",\"description\":\"Trade Secret Series 4 \u2014 Korean criminal punishment analysis.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-18\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03\",\"author\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\",\"name\":\"Taejin Kim\",\"jobTitle\":\"Managing Partner\",\"worksFor\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\"}},\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/home-en\/\"},\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/\"},\"about\":[\"Korean trade secret criminal punishment\",\"Korean Unfair Competition Prevention Act \u00a718\",\"Trade secret series 4\",\"Korean criminal trade secret\"]}<\/script><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#faq\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Where is Atlas Legal located?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal is located at B-2901, Centroad, 323 Incheontower-daero, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon (Songdo International Business District, IFEZ). Postal code 22007.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What languages does Atlas Legal serve clients in?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal serves clients in Korean and English. We routinely advise foreign-invested companies based in Songdo, Cheongna, and Yeongjong International Cities (IFEZ).\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What practice areas does Atlas Legal cover?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal advises on Korean corporate law, shareholder and director disputes, international contracts under Korean law, corporate rehabilitation and bankruptcy under the Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, criminal defense for corporate matters, and trade secret protection.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How can a foreign-invested company in Songdo IFEZ contact Atlas Legal?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Foreign-invested companies in Songdo, Cheongna, or Yeongjong International Cities can contact Atlas Legal at +82-32-864-8300 or info@atlaw.kr. Office hours are Monday to Friday, 09:00-18:00 KST.\"}}]}<\/script><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":[\"LegalService\",\"Service\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal\",\"alternateName\":[\"Atlas Law Firm\",\"Atlas Legal (formerly K&P)\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/home-en\/\",\"telephone\":\"+82-32-864-8300\",\"email\":\"info@atlaw.kr\",\"priceRange\":\"\u20a9\u20a9\u20a9\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"streetAddress\":\"323 Incheontower-daero, B-2901 (Songdo-dong, Centroad)\",\"addressLocality\":\"Yeonsu-gu, Incheon\",\"addressRegion\":\"Incheon Metropolitan City\",\"postalCode\":\"22007\",\"addressCountry\":\"KR\"},\"geo\":{\"@type\":\"GeoCoordinates\",\"latitude\":37.399438,\"longitude\":126.629812},\"openingHoursSpecification\":[{\"@type\":\"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\"dayOfWeek\":[\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\"],\"opens\":\"09:00\",\"closes\":\"18:00\"}],\"areaServed\":[{\"@type\":\"Country\",\"name\":\"South Korea\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Incheon Metropolitan City\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Seoul Special City\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Gyeonggi Province\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Songdo International Business District (IFEZ)\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Cheongna International City (IFEZ)\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Yeongjong International City (IFEZ)\"}],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Korean corporate law\",\"Korean Commercial Act\",\"Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act\",\"International contracts under Korean law\",\"Songdo IFEZ business legal services\"],\"knowsLanguage\":[\"en\",\"ko\"],\"founder\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\"}}<\/script><!-- ATLAS_SEO_BLOCK_END --><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<div class=\"toc\">\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. Legal Foundation and Basic Structure of Trade Secret Infringement Crimes<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. Detailed Analysis of Six Types of Infringement Acts<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. Differences in Elements Between Criminal Punishment and Civil Liability<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. Interpretative Issues and Practical Disputes by Key Crime Types<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#section4-1\">Interpretation of Unauthorized Disclosure Outside Designated Areas<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4-2\">Analysis of Continuous Possession Despite Deletion\/Return Demands<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4-3\">Acquisition by Improper Means and Third-Party Involvement<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. Systematization of Sentencing Standards and Punishment Levels<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. Special Regulatory System under the Industrial Technology Protection Act<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#section6-1\">6.1 Conceptual Distinction Between Industrial Technology and Trade Secrets<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6-2\">6.2 Characteristics of Injunctive Relief Against Infringement<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6-3\">6.3 Special Criminal Punishment Provisions and Aggravating Factors<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. Legal Foundation and Basic Structure of Trade Secret Infringement Crimes<\/h2>\n<p>Criminal protection of trade secrets is primarily governed by the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the Industrial Technology Protection Act. Under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, trade secrets refer to undisclosed information with independent economic value that is confidentially managed, including production methods, sales methods, and other technical or managerial information useful for business activities.<\/p>\n<p>The 2019 legal amendment changed the requirement from &#8220;managed with considerable effort&#8221; to &#8220;confidentially managed,&#8221; relaxing the criteria for trade secret recognition. This change reflects the legislative intent to strengthen trade secret protection.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. Detailed Analysis of Six Types of Infringement Acts<\/h2>\n<p>Article 2, Paragraph 3 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act specifies trade secret infringement acts into six types. This enumeration method can be broadly divided into acts of acquiring others&#8217; trade secrets through improper means and acts of disclosing trade secrets in violation of duties by those in positions to handle trade secrets.<\/p>\n<div class=\"law-box\">\n<h4>Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act<\/h4>\n<p><strong>Article 2 (Definitions)<\/strong> The terms used in this Act are defined as follows:<\/p>\n<p>3. &#8220;Trade secret infringement act&#8221; means any of the following acts:<\/p>\n<p>a. Acquiring trade secrets by theft, deception, intimidation, or other improper means (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;improper acquisition act&#8221;) or using or disclosing such acquired trade secrets (including disclosure to specific persons while maintaining confidentiality; the same applies hereinafter)<\/p>\n<p>b. Acquiring trade secrets knowing or failing to know due to gross negligence that improper acquisition acts were involved with respect to trade secrets, or using or disclosing such acquired trade secrets<\/p>\n<p>c. Using or disclosing trade secrets after acquisition, knowing or failing to know due to gross negligence that improper acquisition acts were involved with respect to such trade secrets<\/p>\n<p>d. Using or disclosing trade secrets by a person who has a duty to maintain trade secrets confidentially under contractual relationships, etc., for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to the trade secret holder<\/p>\n<p>e. Acquiring trade secrets knowing or failing to know due to gross negligence that trade secrets were disclosed under subparagraph d or that such disclosure acts were involved, or using or disclosing such acquired trade secrets<\/p>\n<p>f. Using or disclosing trade secrets after acquisition, knowing or failing to know due to gross negligence that trade secrets were disclosed under subparagraph d or that such disclosure acts were involved<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article 18 (Penalties)<\/strong> \u2460 A person who commits any of the following acts knowing that trade secrets will be used abroad or will be used abroad shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than 1.5 billion won. However, when imposing a fine, if the amount equivalent to 10 times the property gains from the violation exceeds 1.5 billion won, a fine of not less than 2 times and not more than 10 times the property gains shall be imposed.<\/p>\n<p>1. Any of the following acts committed for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders:<\/p>\n<p>a. Acquiring, using, or disclosing trade secrets to third parties<\/p>\n<p>b. Unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets outside designated places<\/p>\n<p>c. Continuing to possess trade secrets despite demands from trade secret holders to delete or return them<\/p>\n<p>2. Acquiring trade secrets by theft, deception, intimidation, or other improper means<\/p>\n<p>3. Acquiring or using trade secrets (excluding use within the scope permitted under Article 13, Paragraph 1) knowing that acts under paragraphs 1 or 2 were involved<\/p>\n<p>\u2461 A person who commits any act under paragraph 1 shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 500 million won. However, when imposing a fine, if the amount equivalent to 10 times the property gains from the violation exceeds 500 million won, a fine of not less than 2 times and not more than 10 times the property gains shall be imposed.<\/p>\n<p>\u2462 A person who damages, destroys, or alters others&#8217; trade secrets in violation of Article 9-8 for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 500 million won.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>This enumeration method aims to ensure legal stability by clarifying punishable acts, though it has been pointed out that it may have limitations in encompassing new types of infringement acts in practice.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. Differences in Elements Between Criminal Punishment and Civil Liability<\/h2>\n<p>The Unfair Competition Prevention Act adopts a method of establishing independent criminal elements in Article 18 rather than directly citing the infringement acts in Article 2. Therefore, there are differences in the elements between trade secret infringement acts (subject to civil liability) and infringement crimes (subject to criminal punishment).<\/p>\n<p>In some cases, it has been suggested that the interpretation of criminal punishment provisions may have a broader scope of application than civil liability subjects. This legislative approach is understood as differentiating the regulatory systems for civil and criminal matters by establishing elements appropriate to each characteristic.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. Interpretative Issues and Practical Disputes by Key Crime Types<\/h2>\n<p>Recent legal amendments have diversified the modes of trade secret infringement acts.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"section4-1\">Interpretation of Unauthorized Disclosure Outside Designated Areas<\/h3>\n<p>Acts of unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets outside designated places for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders have been newly criminalized.<\/p>\n<h4>Interpretation of the Scope of &#8220;Designated Places&#8221;<\/h4>\n<p>While there is no explicit definition of the concept of &#8220;designated places&#8221; itself, it is interpreted to refer to internal management areas, etc., in the context of the provision punishing acts of taking things &#8220;outside designated places.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4>&#8220;Disclosure&#8221; Concept and Its Relationship with Unauthorized Removal<\/h4>\n<p>Considering the relationship between punishment provisions, to avoid the problem of simultaneous establishment of the disclosure crime under Article 18, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 1(a) and the unauthorized disclosure crime under Subparagraph 1(b), the prevailing view is that &#8220;disclosure&#8221; in this provision should be interpreted as simply taking trade secrets outside designated places (&#8220;unauthorized removal&#8221;). In other words, it treats the act of removing trade secrets from the company&#8217;s control as punishable even if it does not necessarily lead to disclosure.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"section4-2\">Analysis of Continuous Possession Despite Deletion\/Return Demands<\/h3>\n<p>Acts of continuing to possess trade secrets despite demands from trade secret holders to delete or return them for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders have been newly made punishable.<\/p>\n<h4>Need to Confirm Legitimate Authority of &#8220;Trade Secret Holders&#8221;<\/h4>\n<p>For this crime to be established, it would be necessary to confirm whether the &#8220;trade secret holder&#8221; has legitimate authority to demand deletion or return. This is because the definition of trade secrets presupposes possession by legitimate rights holders.<\/p>\n<h4>Questions About the Possibility of Punishing Attempted Crimes and Preparation\/Conspiracy for Continuous Possession<\/h4>\n<p>Since continuous possession acts are completed through omission and have a strong character that does not presuppose the occurrence of results, it has been suggested that it is difficult to specify preparation and conspiracy acts for such crimes and punishment is practically impossible.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"section4-3\">Acquisition by Improper Means and Third-Party Involvement<\/h3>\n<p>This punishes acts of acquiring trade secrets by theft, deception, intimidation, or other improper means.<\/p>\n<h4>Scope of Interpretation of &#8220;Improper Means&#8221;<\/h4>\n<p>This is interpreted as a broad concept that includes not only criminal acts under criminal law (theft, deception, intimidation) but also violations of confidentiality duties or inducements to such violations, and all acts or means contrary to social order in light of sound transaction order or fair competition principles.<\/p>\n<h4>Third-Party Subsequent Involvement Acts<\/h4>\n<p>Acts of acquiring or using trade secrets knowing or failing to know due to gross negligence that improper acquisition acts were involved, or acts of using or disclosing after acquisition knowing or failing to know such facts due to gross negligence, and other subsequent acquisition, use, and disclosure acts by third parties regarding trade secrets acquired through improper methods are also subject to punishment.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. Systematization of Sentencing Standards and Punishment Levels<\/h2>\n<p>Article 18 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act differentially punishes trade secret infringement acts as follows:<\/p>\n<h3>Domestic Purpose Acts<\/h3>\n<p>Acts of acquiring, using, or disclosing trade secrets to third parties for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders are punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 500 million won. The statutory penalties have been increased compared to before the amendment.<\/p>\n<h3>Foreign Purpose Acts (Aggravated Punishment)<\/h3>\n<p>Acts of acquiring, using, or disclosing trade secrets to third parties knowing they will be used abroad or for the purpose of obtaining improper benefits or causing damage to trade secret holders are punished by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than 1.5 billion won. Aggravated punishment provisions for foreign leakage existed previously.<\/p>\n<h3>Fines Based on Property Gains<\/h3>\n<p>When property gains from violations exceed a certain amount, fines are set within the range of 2 to 10 times the property gains. The difficulty in calculating gains has been pointed out as making practical sanctions challenging.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. Special Regulatory System under the Industrial Technology Protection Act<\/h2>\n<p>The Industrial Technology Protection Act is a law with different purposes and systems from the trade secret protection law, focusing primarily on protecting the nation&#8217;s core technologies.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6-1\">6.1 Conceptual Distinction Between Industrial Technology and Trade Secrets<\/h2>\n<p>Industrial technology under the Industrial Technology Protection Act refers to technical information necessary for the development, production, distribution, and use of products or services that is designated, announced, proclaimed, or certified by heads of administrative agencies according to laws. This does not necessarily require secrecy and differs from trade secrets in that it involves designation and announcement procedures by heads of central administrative agencies.<\/p>\n<p>National core technologies are included within the scope of industrial technology and refer to technologies designated as having the potential to cause serious adverse effects on national security and the national economy if leaked. The Industrial Technology Protection Act aims at national security, differentiating it from the trade secret protection law which focuses on protecting the private interests of individual economic entities.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the Industrial Technology Protection Act protects only technical information, while the trade secret protection law includes both technical and managerial information.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6-2\">6.2 Characteristics of Injunctive Relief Against Infringement<\/h2>\n<p>Target institutions (institutions possessing and managing national core technologies) may petition courts to prohibit or prevent acts by those who commit or intend to commit industrial technology infringement acts. They may also petition for necessary measures such as disposal of objects that created infringement acts and removal of facilities.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6-3\">6.3 Special Criminal Punishment Provisions and Aggravating Factors<\/h2>\n<p>Article 36 of the Industrial Technology Protection Act punishes industrial technology infringement acts as follows:<\/p>\n<h3>Foreign Use Purpose Penalties (Aggravated Punishment)<\/h3>\n<p>Those who commit acts under Article 14 of the same law, such as improperly acquiring, disclosing, or using industrial technology for the purpose of use abroad or causing it to be used abroad, are punished by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than 1.5 billion won.<\/p>\n<h3>Domestic Use Purpose Penalties<\/h3>\n<p>When committing acts of acquiring, disclosing, or using industrial technology for domestic use or causing it to be used domestically, punishment is imprisonment for not more than 7 years or a fine of not more than 700 million won.<\/p>\n<h3>Concurrent Imposition of Imprisonment and Fines<\/h3>\n<p>In the above cases, imprisonment and fines may be imposed concurrently.<\/p>\n<h3>Confiscation of Gains<\/h3>\n<p>The Industrial Technology Protection Act has the characteristic of being able to confiscate all profits obtained by infringers from infringement acts. This is a difference from the trade secret protection law.<\/p>\n<h3>Punishment for Attempted Crimes and Preparation\/Conspiracy<\/h3>\n<p>Attempted crimes under Article 14 infringement acts are also punished. Additionally, there are punishment provisions for preparation or conspiracy for acts committed for the purpose of using industrial technology abroad or acts corresponding to domestic cases (foreign purpose: imprisonment for not more than 3 years or fine of not more than 30 million won \/ domestic purpose: imprisonment for not more than 2 years or fine of not more than 20 million won).<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin: 30px 0; padding: 20px; background-color: #e8f5e9; border-left: 4px solid #4caf50; border-radius: 5px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top: 0; color: #2e7d32;\">Atlas Legal Practical Cases<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knplawfirm1.tistory.com\/entry\/\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\uc720\ucd9c\uc0ac\uac74-\ubb34\uc8c4\" style=\"color: #1976d2; text-decoration: none; font-size: 18px;\">Trade Secret Leakage Case &#8211; Not Guilty Verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knplawfirm1.tistory.com\/entry\/\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\uce68\ud574-\uc0ac\uac74-\ucc98\ub9ac-\uc0ac\ub840\uc778\ucc9c-\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\uc804\ubb38-\ubcc0\ud638\uc0ac\" style=\"color: #1976d2; text-decoration: none; font-size: 18px;\">Trade Secret Infringement Case Handling &#8211; Incheon Trade Secret Specialist Attorney<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knplawfirm1.tistory.com\/entry\/\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\ucde8\ub4dd-\ubc0f-\uc0ac\uc6a9\uc0ac\uac74-\ubb34\uc8c4\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\uc804\ubb38-\ubcc0\ud638\uc0ac-\uae40\ud0dc\uc9c4\" style=\"color: #1976d2; text-decoration: none; font-size: 18px;\">Trade Secret Acquisition and Use Case &#8211; Not Guilty by Trade Secret Specialist Attorney Taejin Kim<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knplawfirm1.tistory.com\/entry\/\ubd80\uc815\uacbd\uc7c1\ubc29\uc9c0\ubc95-\uc5c5\ubb34\uc0c1-\ubc30\uc784-\ud610\uc758\uc5c6\uc74c-\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778-\ucf00\uc774\uc564\ud53c-\uc2b9\uc18c\uc0ac\ub840\" style=\"color: #1976d2; text-decoration: none; font-size: 18px;\">Unfair Competition Prevention Act Breach of Trust &#8211; No Charges by Atlas Legal Victory Case<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knplawfirm1.tistory.com\/entry\/\uc804\uc9c1\uae08\uc9c0-\uac00\ucc98\ubd84-\uc2b9\uc18c\uc601\uc5c5\ube44\ubc00-\uad00\ub828-\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778-\ucf00\uc774\uc564\ud53c-\uc2b9\uc18c\uc0ac\ub840-1\" style=\"color: #1976d2; text-decoration: none; font-size: 18px;\">Employment Prohibition Injunction Victory &#8211; Trade Secret Related Atlas Legal Victory Case<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 4px solid #722f37; font-family: Georgia, serif;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 20px; color: #2c3e50; font-weight: bold;\">About the Author<\/h3>\n<div style=\"font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: #333; margin-bottom: 5px;\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner, Atlas Legal<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 5px; line-height: 1.4;\">Attorney specializing in Corporate Advisory, Corporate Disputes, Corporate Criminal Law<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 5px; line-height: 1.4;\">Former Prosecutor | 33rd Class of Judicial Research and Training Institute<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 15px; line-height: 1.4;\">Korea University LL.B, LL.M. in Criminal Law, University of California, Davis LL.M.<\/div>\n<p>            <a href=\"https:\/\/        \n\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        atlaw.kr\/en&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener noreferrer&#8221; style=&#8221;display: inline-block; background-color: #722f37; color: white; padding: 12px 24px; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 6px; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; border: 2px solid #722f37; cursor: pointer; box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3); margin-top: 5px;&#8221;>Visit Atlas Legal Website<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. Legal Foundation and Basic Structure of Trade Secret Infringement Crimes 2. Detailed Analysis of Six Types of Infringement Acts 3. Differences in Elements Between Criminal Punishment and Civil Liability 4. Interpretative Issues and Practical Disputes by Key Crime Types Interpretation of Unauthorized Disclosure Outside Designated Areas Analysis of Continuous Possession Despite&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[226,16,224],"tags":[87,75,85,86,74],"class_list":["post-71","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trade-secrets","category-criminal","category-white-collar-crime","tag-corporate-criminal-attorney","tag-industrial-technology-protection-act","tag-trade-secret-criminal-punishment","tag-trade-secret-infringement-crime","tag-unfair-competition-prevention-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>[Attorney Taejin Kim&#039;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#039;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13\ubd84\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#8217;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2202,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"corporate criminal attorney\",\"industrial technology protection act\",\"trade secret criminal punishment\",\"trade secret infringement crime\",\"unfair competition prevention act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Trade Secrets\",\"White Collar Crime\",\"White-Collar Crime\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/\",\"name\":\"[Attorney Taejin Kim's Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\\\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#8217;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Attorney Taejin Kim's Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act","description":"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Attorney Taejin Kim's Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act","og_description":"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04":"13\ubd84"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#8217;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act","datePublished":"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/"},"wordCount":2202,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["corporate criminal attorney","industrial technology protection act","trade secret criminal punishment","trade secret infringement crime","unfair competition prevention act"],"articleSection":["Trade Secrets","White Collar Crime","White-Collar Crime"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/","name":"[Attorney Taejin Kim's Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-18T06:37:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T21:26:13+00:00","description":"Everything about criminal punishment for trade secret infringement! Attorney Taejin Kim provides detailed analysis of 6 types of infringement under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, statutory penalties by domestic\/international purposes, and differences from Industrial Technology Protection Act. Check with practical cases.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/attorney-taejin-kims-trade-secret-series-4-complete-analysis-of-criminal-punishment-provisions-punishment-system-under-the-unfair-competition-prevention-act-and-industrial-technology-pro\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Attorney Taejin Kim&#8217;s Trade Secret Series 4] Complete Analysis of Criminal Punishment Provisions \u2013 Punishment System under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and Industrial Technology Protection Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1131,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71\/revisions\/1131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}