{"id":685,"date":"2026-03-12T22:22:58","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T22:22:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=685"},"modified":"2026-05-03T08:33:50","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T08:33:50","slug":"patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_START --><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ko\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%ed%8a%b9%ed%97%88%ea%b6%8c-%ec%96%91%eb%8f%84-%ec%82%ac%ed%95%b4%ed%96%89%ec%9c%84%ec%b7%a8%ec%86%8c\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"x-default\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%ed%8a%b9%ed%97%88%ea%b6%8c-%ec%96%91%eb%8f%84-%ec%82%ac%ed%95%b4%ed%96%89%ec%9c%84%ec%b7%a8%ec%86%8c\/\" \/><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_END --><br \/>\n<!-- Article Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"Article\", \"headline\": \"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?\", \"description\": \"If a debtor transfers patents to a third party to hide assets, South Korean law allows creditors to void the assignment and recover the patents. A practical guide to fraudulent transfer claims involving intellectual property under South Korean civil law.\", \"author\": {\"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Taejin Kim\", \"jobTitle\": \"Managing Partner\", \"worksFor\": {\"@type\": \"LegalService\", \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"address\": {\"@type\": \"PostalAddress\", \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\", \"addressRegion\": \"Songdo, South Korea\"}}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\"}, \"publisher\": {\"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\"}, \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-13\", \"dateModified\": \"2026-03-13\", \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\"@type\": \"WebPage\"}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea#article\"}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- FAQ Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Can a patent assignment be voided as a fraudulent transfer in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Yes. Under Article 406 of the Korean Civil Act, a creditor may apply to court to void any disposition of property \u2014 including a patent assignment \u2014 made by a debtor with intent to prejudice creditors. If the debtor became insolvent as a result, fraudulent intent is presumed.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"How is fraudulent intent proved in a patent assignment case in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"South Korean courts presume fraudulent intent when a debtor transfers their only significant asset. The burden then shifts to the transferee (beneficiary) to prove they had no knowledge of the fraudulent nature of the transaction (Supreme Court Decision 2000Da41875, April 24, 2001).\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"What happens if a debtor in South Korea transfers both a vessel and patents to the same party around the same time?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"South Korean courts may treat multiple dispositions as a single transaction when the transferee is the same, the transfers occurred close in time, and the underlying motive was the same \u2014 such as settling a joint venture. The court then assesses the overall effect on the debtor's solvency (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da34740, March 27, 2014).\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"How are patents restored after a fraudulent transfer is voided in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Once a court voids the assignment, the transferee must cancel the patent transfer registration, restoring ownership to the debtor. The court order specifies the cancellation of the relevant transfer registration at the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Does the protected claim have to exist before the fraudulent transfer in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Yes. The creditor's claim must have arisen before the fraudulent act. A claim that is not yet due or is conditional at the time of the transfer can still qualify as a protected claim under South Korean law.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Can a patent transfer made as part of a joint venture settlement still be voided in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Yes. Even if the transfer was made to settle debts within a joint venture arrangement, South Korean courts may still void it if the overall effect was to deprive general creditors of their common security. The purpose or label of the transaction does not override its effect on creditor rights.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"What is the time limit for filing a fraudulent transfer claim in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Under Article 406(2) of the Korean Civil Act, a creditor must file within one year of learning the grounds for revocation, and within five years of the date of the fraudulent act. Missing either deadline extinguishes the right.\"}}], \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea#faq\"}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- LocalBusiness Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"LocalBusiness\",\n    \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/logo.png\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n    \"telephone\": \"+82-32-864-8300\",\n    \"address\": {\n        \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n        \"streetAddress\": \"323 Incheon Tower-daero, Unit B-2901 (Centrod, Songdo-dong)\",\n        \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n        \"addressRegion\": \"\uc778\ucc9c\uad11\uc5ed\uc2dc \uc5f0\uc218\uad6c\",\n        \"addressCountry\": \"KR\"\n    },\n    \"priceRange\": \"$$\",\n    \"openingHoursSpecification\": {\n        \"@type\": \"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\n        \"dayOfWeek\": [\n            \"Monday\",\n            \"Tuesday\",\n            \"Wednesday\",\n            \"Thursday\",\n            \"Friday\"\n        ],\n        \"opens\": \"09:00\",\n        \"closes\": \"18:00\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<style>\n    body {\n        font-family: Georgia, serif;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        max-width: 1000px;\n        margin: 0 auto;\n        padding: 20px;\n        background-color: #f9f9f9;\n    }\n    .content-container {\n        background-color: white;\n        padding: 20px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    h2 {\n        font-size: 22px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    h3 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #34495e;\n        margin-top: 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    p, li {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n    }\n    ul, ol {\n        padding-left: 25px;\n        margin: 10px 0;\n    }\n    li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    table {\n        width: 100%;\n        border-collapse: collapse;\n        margin: 15px 0;\n    }\n    th, td {\n        border: 1px solid #ddd;\n        padding: 10px;\n        text-align: left;\n        font-size: 16px;\n    }\n    th {\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .toc {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .toc h2 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    .toc ul {\n        list-style-type: none;\n        padding-left: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .toc ul li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .toc a {\n        text-decoration: none !important;\n        color: #3498db;\n        border-bottom: none !important;\n    }\n    .toc a:hover {\n        text-decoration: underline;\n    }\n    .story-hook {\n        padding: 15px 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-hook p {\n        font-style: italic;\n        color: #555;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .direct-answer {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        font-weight: 500;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 20px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        font-size: 19px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n    }\n    .story-detail p {\n        line-height: 1.8;\n        color: #444;\n    }\n    .disclaimer {\n        font-size: 15px;\n        color: #666;\n        font-style: italic;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n    }\n    .faq-section {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 30px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .faq-item {\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n    }\n    .faq-question {\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-bottom: 8px;\n        font-size: 18px;\n    }\n    .faq-answer {\n        color: #555;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n    }\n    .author-box {\n        background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\n    }\n    .author-box h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-name {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-info {\n        font-size: 16px;\n        color: #555;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n        line-height: 1.4;\n    }\n    .author-box a {\n        display: inline-block;\n        background-color: #722f37;\n        color: white;\n        padding: 12px 24px;\n        text-decoration: none;\n        border-radius: 6px;\n        font-size: 16px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        border: 2px solid #722f37;\n        cursor: pointer;\n        box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3);\n        margin-top: 5px;\n    }\n    br {\n        display: none;\n    }\n    strong {\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    @media (max-width: 768px) {\n        body {\n            padding: 10px;\n        }\n        .content-container {\n            padding: 15px;\n        }\n        h2 {\n            font-size: 18px;\n        }\n        h3 {\n            font-size: 17px;\n        }\n        p, li {\n            font-size: 16px;\n        }\n        th, td {\n            font-size: 14px;\n            padding: 8px;\n        }\n    }\n    .site-container, .content-area, .entry-content {\n        padding: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .entry-content > *:first-child {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .entry-content {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .kb-row-container, .kb-column-container {\n        margin: 0;\n        padding: 0;\n    }\n<\/style>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<div class=\"toc\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0; margin: 0;\">\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. Are Patents Subject to Fraudulent Transfer Claims in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. How Is Fraudulent Intent Established in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. How Are Multiple Asset Disposals Assessed in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. Can a Patent Transfer Made to Settle Debts Still Be Voided in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. How Are Patents Restored After a Fraudulent Transfer Is Voided in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<div class=\"story-hook\" style=\"padding: 15px 20px; margin-bottom: 15px; border-radius: 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p><strong>Case Background:<\/strong> A company obtained a court judgment for over KRW 213 million in unpaid charter fees. By the time the judgment was final, the debtor had already transferred its only assets \u2014 a vessel and two patents \u2014 to a third party. There was nothing left to enforce against. Was there any recourse?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"direct-answer\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-weight: 500; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n        <strong>Direct Answer:<\/strong> Yes. Under Article 406 of the Korean Civil Act, a patent assignment qualifies as a fraudulent transfer if it leaves the debtor insolvent. South Korean courts presume fraudulent intent when a debtor disposes of their only assets, and the creditor may seek revocation and restoration of the patents through litigation.\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"story-detail\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 20px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h3>A Winning Judgment \u2014 But Nothing Left to Collect<\/h3>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\">\u203b This case is based on a matter handled by Atlas Legal. Certain facts have been modified to protect client confidentiality.<\/p>\n<p>After the creditor&#8217;s charter fee claim arose, the debtor entered into patent assignment agreements for two patents on December 29, 2011, completing the transfer registration in favor of a third party on January 12, 2012. When the creditor obtained a judgment on January 17, 2013, the debtor&#8217;s assets \u2014 both the vessel and the patents \u2014 had already been transferred. The court voided the patent assignments as fraudulent transfers and ordered cancellation of the transfer registrations. The key legal reasoning is set out below.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. Are Patents Subject to Fraudulent Transfer Claims in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>Under Article 406(1) of the Korean Civil Act, a creditor may apply to court to revoke any act involving property rights that a debtor performed with the knowledge that it would prejudice creditors, and to claim restoration of the original state. Patents carry economic value and constitute property rights, making them fully subject to South Korean fraudulent transfer law.<\/p>\n<h3>The Protected Claim Requirement<\/h3>\n<p>The creditor&#8217;s claim must have arisen before the fraudulent act. In the case described here, the charter fee claim arose around November 30, 2011, while the patent assignment was executed on December 29, 2011 \u2014 satisfying the timing requirement.<\/p>\n<h3>Elements of a Fraudulent Transfer Claim in South Korea<\/h3>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Element<\/th>\n<th>Description<\/th>\n<th>Finding in This Case<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Protected Claim<\/td>\n<td>Creditor&#8217;s claim arising before the impugned act<\/td>\n<td>Satisfied (charter fee claim arose Nov. 2011; assignment Dec. 2011)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fraudulent Act<\/td>\n<td>Disposition of property rights reducing common security<\/td>\n<td>Satisfied (only assets \u2014 vessel and patents \u2014 transferred together)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Debtor&#8217;s Fraudulent Intent<\/td>\n<td>Debtor&#8217;s awareness that creditors would be prejudiced<\/td>\n<td>Presumed (sole assets disposed of)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Transferee&#8217;s Bad Faith<\/td>\n<td>Transferee&#8217;s knowledge of the fraudulent nature<\/td>\n<td>Presumed (no rebuttal evidence)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. How Is Fraudulent Intent Established in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>Proving a debtor&#8217;s subjective intent directly is rarely feasible. South Korean courts apply a presumption rule that significantly eases the creditor&#8217;s evidentiary burden.<\/p>\n<h3>The Presumption of Fraudulent Intent<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court of Korea has held that when a debtor converts their only significant asset into easily dissipated cash, this constitutes a fraudulent transfer absent special circumstances, and the debtor&#8217;s fraudulent intent is presumed. The burden of proving good faith shifts to the transferee (Supreme Court Decision 2000Da41875, April 24, 2001).<\/p>\n<p>In the case at hand, the court found that both the debtor&#8217;s fraudulent intent and the transferee&#8217;s bad faith were presumed and that there was no evidence sufficient to rebut that presumption.<\/p>\n<h3>What Must the Transferee Show to Rebut the Presumption?<\/h3>\n<p>The transferee must produce concrete evidence that they were unaware the transfer would prejudice creditors. It is not enough to show that a fair price was paid or that the transaction appeared commercially normal. The transferee must demonstrate actual lack of knowledge of the debtor&#8217;s financial condition. In practice, this is rarely achieved successfully.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. How Are Multiple Asset Disposals Assessed in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>When a debtor transfers several assets in quick succession, South Korean courts must decide whether to evaluate each transfer individually or treat them as a single composite act.<\/p>\n<h3>The General Rule: Each Transfer Assessed Separately<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court of Korea has stated that where a debtor makes a series of asset disposals, the default approach is to assess each act individually by asking whether that particular act caused or deepened insolvency (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da34740, March 27, 2014).<\/p>\n<h3>The Exception: Treating Multiple Transfers as One Act<\/h3>\n<p>However, the same decision recognized that where there is a special circumstance justifying treating a series of acts as a single transaction, the court should assess their combined effect on solvency. The relevant factors are:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Factor<\/th>\n<th>Description<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same transferee<\/td>\n<td>All disposals made to the same counterparty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Temporal proximity<\/td>\n<td>Disposals made close together in time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Relationship between parties<\/td>\n<td>Special relationship between debtor and transferee<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common motive or opportunity<\/td>\n<td>Same underlying purpose driving all transfers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>In the case discussed here, the patent assignment (December 29, 2011) and the vessel sale (January 6, 2012) were both made to the same party in close succession, as part of unwinding a joint operating agreement and settling mutual claims \u2014 satisfying all four factors. The court assessed the two transfers together as a single composite act.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. Can a Patent Transfer Made to Settle Debts Still Be Voided in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>Debtors frequently argue that a patent transfer was simply part of a legitimate commercial settlement and therefore cannot constitute a fraudulent transfer. South Korean courts have addressed this argument directly.<\/p>\n<h3>Settlement Purpose Does Not Override Creditor Protection<\/h3>\n<p>The court in this case acknowledged that the patent assignment arose from the unwinding of a joint operating agreement between the parties. Nevertheless, it held that viewing the patent assignment and vessel sale together, the transferee had effectively received all of the debtor&#8217;s only assets \u2014 and that this constituted a fraudulent transfer prejudicing general creditors, regardless of the settlement framing.<\/p>\n<h3>The Underlying Principle<\/h3>\n<p>Regardless of the label attached to a transaction \u2014 debt settlement, security enforcement, or joint venture wind-down \u2014 if the net effect is to remove assets from the debtor&#8217;s estate and leave general creditors without recourse, South Korean law treats the transaction as a fraudulent transfer. Where the transfer favors a specific creditor over others, separate rules on preferential transfers may also apply and should be analyzed independently.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. How Are Patents Restored After a Fraudulent Transfer Is Voided in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>Revocation of the fraudulent act must be accompanied by restoration to the original state. For real property, this means cancellation of the ownership transfer registration. For patents, the equivalent remedy is cancellation of the patent transfer registration at the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).<\/p>\n<h3>The Court Order in This Case<\/h3>\n<p>The court ordered the transferee to complete the cancellation of the full transfer registration for both patents \u2014 referencing the specific KIPO filing number \u2014 thereby restoring ownership in the patents to the debtor.<\/p>\n<h3>Practical Considerations for Creditors in South Korea<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Statute of limitations:<\/strong> Under Article 406(2) of the Korean Civil Act, the claim must be filed within one year of learning the grounds for revocation, and within five years of the date of the fraudulent act.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Identifying the correct defendant:<\/strong> The action must be brought against the transferee. If the patents have been further assigned to a third party, a separate claim against the subsequent transferee must be considered.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Remedy if re-transfer has occurred:<\/strong> Where the patents have already been re-assigned, value-based compensation may substitute for in-kind restoration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Interim injunction:<\/strong> If there is a risk the transferee may re-assign the patents during litigation, a provisional injunction against disposition should be sought promptly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-section\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 30px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q1. Can a patent assignment be voided as a fraudulent transfer in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. Under Article 406 of the Korean Civil Act, a creditor may apply to court to void any disposition of property \u2014 including a patent assignment \u2014 made by a debtor with intent to prejudice creditors. If the debtor became insolvent as a result, fraudulent intent is presumed.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q2. How is fraudulent intent proved in a patent assignment case in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. South Korean courts presume fraudulent intent when a debtor transfers their only significant asset. The burden then shifts to the transferee to prove good faith (Supreme Court Decision 2000Da41875, April 24, 2001). In practice, successfully rebutting this presumption is uncommon.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q3. What happens if a debtor in South Korea transfers both a vessel and patents to the same party around the same time?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. South Korean courts may treat the transfers as a single act when the same party received all assets in close succession for the same underlying reason. The court then assesses the combined impact on the debtor&#8217;s solvency (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da34740, March 27, 2014).<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q4. How are patents restored after a fraudulent transfer is voided in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. The court orders the transferee to cancel the patent transfer registration at KIPO, restoring ownership to the debtor. Creditors should seek a provisional injunction against re-assignment during the litigation to protect this remedy.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q5. Does the protected claim have to exist before the fraudulent transfer in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. The creditor&#8217;s claim must pre-date the fraudulent act. Claims not yet due or subject to conditions at the time of the transfer can still qualify as protected claims under South Korean law.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q6. Can a patent transfer made as part of a joint venture settlement still be voided in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. If the overall effect of the settlement was to strip the debtor of all assets and leave general creditors without recourse, South Korean courts will treat the transaction as a fraudulent transfer regardless of its settlement framing.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q7. What is the time limit for filing a fraudulent transfer claim in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Under Article 406(2) of the Korean Civil Act, the claim must be filed within one year of learning the grounds for revocation, and within five years of the date of the fraudulent act. Both deadlines are absolute and cannot be extended.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Fraudulent transfer claims involving patents and other intellectual property in South Korea require careful analysis of how the transfers were structured and timed. Our team&#8217;s review of this matter confirmed that where multiple assets are disposed of together, the key to establishing fraud lies in framing the transfers as a single composite act and demonstrating their combined impact on the debtor&#8217;s solvency.<\/p>\n<p>Atlas Legal, based in Incheon Songdo, South Korea, advises creditors on enforcement strategy, fraudulent transfer litigation, and asset recovery. Our experience in corporate disputes and debt collection informs a practical, results-focused approach to each matter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\" style=\"margin: 20px 0;\">\u203b The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The appropriate legal strategy will depend on the specific facts of each case. Please consult a qualified attorney before taking any action.<\/p>\n<div class=\"author-box\" style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\">\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<div class=\"author-name\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Corporate Advisory, Corporate Disputes &amp; Corporate Criminal Defense<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Former Prosecutor | 33rd Class, Judicial Research &amp; Training Institute<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">LL.B. &amp; LL.M. in Criminal Law, Korea University | LL.M., University of California, Davis<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Visit Atlas Legal<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. Are Patents Subject to Fraudulent Transfer Claims in South Korea? 2. How Is Fraudulent Intent Established in South Korea? 3. How Are Multiple Asset Disposals Assessed in South Korea? 4. Can a Patent Transfer Made to Settle Debts Still Be Voided in South Korea? 5. How Are Patents Restored After a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,223,15],"tags":[535,532,531,534,533],"class_list":["post-685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil","category-corporate-disputes","category-corporate","tag-asset-recovery-korea","tag-creditor-rights-korea","tag-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea","tag-korean-civil-act-article-406","tag-patent-assignment-void"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1849,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"asset recovery Korea\",\"creditor rights Korea\",\"fraudulent transfer South Korea\",\"Korean Civil Act Article 406\",\"patent assignment void\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil\\\/Administrative\",\"Corporate Disputes\",\"Corporate\\\/International\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/\",\"name\":\"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00\",\"description\":\"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","description":"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","og_description":"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?","datePublished":"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/"},"wordCount":1849,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["asset recovery Korea","creditor rights Korea","fraudulent transfer South Korea","Korean Civil Act Article 406","patent assignment void"],"articleSection":["Civil\/Administrative","Corporate Disputes","Corporate\/International"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/","name":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-12T22:22:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T08:33:50+00:00","description":"South Korean law allows creditors to void patent assignments made to hide assets. Learn how fraudulent intent is presumed and how patents are restored through litigation under Korean civil law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/patent-assignment-fraudulent-transfer-south-korea\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can a Patent Assignment Be Voided as a Fraudulent Transfer in South Korea?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=685"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":965,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685\/revisions\/965"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}