{"id":657,"date":"2026-03-06T23:22:37","date_gmt":"2026-03-06T23:22:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=657"},"modified":"2026-05-27T00:11:29","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T00:11:29","slug":"illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_START --><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ko\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%eb%8f%84%ea%b8%89%ea%b3%84%ec%95%bd-%eb%b6%88%eb%b2%95%ed%8c%8c%ea%b2%ac-%ed%8c%90%eb%8b%a8%ea%b8%b0%ec%a4%80-2026\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"x-default\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%eb%8f%84%ea%b8%89%ea%b3%84%ec%95%bd-%eb%b6%88%eb%b2%95%ed%8c%8c%ea%b2%ac-%ed%8c%90%eb%8b%a8%ea%b8%b0%ec%a4%80-2026\/\" \/><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_END --><br \/>\n<!-- ===== Schema Markup ===== --><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"Article\", \"headline\": \"When Does a Subcontracting Agreement Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? 2026 Court Ruling Analysis\", \"description\": \"South Korea's Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, Jan. 22, 2026) ruled that a 28-year outsourcing contract was in substance an illegal labor dispatch. Learn the legal criteria and what companies must do to manage dispatch risk.\", \"author\": {\"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Taejin Kim\", \"jobTitle\": \"Attorney at Law\", \"worksFor\": {\"@type\": \"LegalService\", \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"address\": {\"@type\": \"PostalAddress\", \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\", \"addressRegion\": \"Yeonsu-gu, Incheon\"}}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\"}, \"publisher\": {\"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\"}, \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-07\", \"dateModified\": \"2026-03-07\", \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\"@type\": \"WebPage\"}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026#article\"}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"What is the legal test for illegal labor dispatch in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"South Korea's Supreme Court (2010Da106436, Feb. 26, 2015) held that courts must look past contract labels and assess the substance of the relationship based on five factors: (1) whether the principal exercises binding operational control over the contractor's workers; (2) whether those workers are substantively integrated into the principal's business; (3) whether the original employer independently decides staffing, training, and attendance; (4) whether the contract scope is a defined, specialized deliverable; and (5) whether the original employer has an independent organizational and operational structure.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"What must a South Korean company do when illegal dispatch is confirmed?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Under Article 6-2(1) of South Korea's Act on the Protection of Dispatched Workers (Dispatch Act), if illegal dispatch is confirmed for work outside the permitted dispatch categories listed in the Enforcement Decree, the principal (deemed user company) must directly employ the dispatched workers. If the principal refuses, the workers may file suit to compel a declaration of employment, which takes effect on the date the judgment becomes final.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Can a company still face illegal dispatch liability even if the contractor has its own organization and equipment?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Yes. The Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, Jan. 22, 2026) held that even where the contractor maintained vehicles, equipment, and independent corporate structure and performed some other contracts, illegal dispatch can still be found if the contractor's expertise was built primarily through the principal's training, if the contractor's revenue depended overwhelmingly on the single contract, and if the principal funded all equipment purchases.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Does the statute of limitations apply to direct employment claims under South Korea's Dispatch Act?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"A ten-year limitation period applies (Civil Act Art. 162(1)), but the clock does not start while the dispatch relationship continues. South Korea's Supreme Court (2024Da203891, Jul. 25, 2024) confirmed that so long as the unlawful dispatch persists, the direct employment claim arises continuously. The Gwangju High Court applied this rule in 2023Na23653, rejecting the principal's limitations defense.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Is service fee proportional to headcount a sign of illegal dispatch in South Korea?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"The court in 2023Na23653 treated fee-for-headcount pricing as an indicator of illegal dispatch. When the fee reflects reimbursement of actual labor costs rather than payment for a completed deliverable, and the contractor has no realistic ability to generate independent profit, the contract resembles a labor supply arrangement rather than a genuine outsourcing contract.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Does a principal's right to request worker replacement under a service agreement prevent a finding of illegal dispatch?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. The court distinguished between a principal's right to remove a specific worker from a particular contract (a permissible contractor management measure) and the broader practice of auditing individual attendance, evaluating personal work conduct, and directing the contractor to discipline or reward individual employees. The latter goes beyond the scope of legitimate outsourcing supervision and constitutes a dispatch indicator.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"How should companies in South Korea restructure outsourcing contracts to reduce illegal dispatch risk?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Practical steps include: (1) routing all operational instructions through the contractor's management, not directly to workers; (2) giving the contractor genuine autonomy over headcount, qualifications, and scheduling within minimum statutory requirements; (3) confining audits to output quality rather than individual attendance or personal conduct; (4) restructuring fees to reward measurable deliverables so the contractor can earn independent profit; and (5) ensuring the contractor funds its own equipment from its own capital.\"}}], \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026#faq\"}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":[\"LegalService\",\"LocalBusiness\"],\"name\":\"Atlas Legal\",\"image\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/logo.png\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\"telephone\":\"+82-32-864-8300\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"streetAddress\":\"323 Incheon Tower-daero, B-dong 2901, Songdo-dong, Sentrod\",\"addressLocality\":\"Incheon\",\"addressRegion\":\"Yeonsu-gu, Incheon\",\"addressCountry\":\"KR\"},\"priceRange\":\"$$\",\"openingHoursSpecification\":{\"@type\":\"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\"dayOfWeek\":[\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\"],\"opens\":\"09:00\",\"closes\":\"18:00\"},\"areaServed\":[{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Republic of Korea\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Incheon\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Seoul\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Gyeonggi-do\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Songdo International Business District\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Cheongna International City\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Yeongjong International City\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Incheon Free Economic Zone (IFEZ)\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Seoul Metropolitan Area\"}],\"geo\":{\"@type\":\"GeoCoordinates\",\"latitude\":37.399438,\"longitude\":126.629812},\"email\":\"info@atlaw.kr\"}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- ===== CSS ===== --><\/p>\n<style>\n    body {\n        font-family: Georgia, serif;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        max-width: 1000px;\n        margin: 0 auto;\n        padding: 20px;\n        background-color: #f9f9f9;\n    }\n    .content-container {\n        background-color: white;\n        padding: 20px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    h2 {\n        font-size: 22px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    h3 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #34495e;\n        margin-top: 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    p, li {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n    }\n    ul, ol {\n        padding-left: 25px;\n        margin: 10px 0;\n    }\n    li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    table {\n        width: 100%;\n        border-collapse: collapse;\n        margin: 15px 0;\n    }\n    th, td {\n        border: 1px solid #ddd;\n        padding: 10px;\n        text-align: left;\n        font-size: 16px;\n    }\n    th {\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .toc {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .toc h2 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    .toc ul {\n        list-style-type: none;\n        padding-left: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .toc ul li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .toc a {\n        text-decoration: none !important;\n        color: #3498db;\n        border-bottom: none !important;\n    }\n    .toc a:hover {\n        text-decoration: underline;\n    }\n    .story-hook {\n        padding: 15px 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-hook p {\n        font-style: italic;\n        color: #555;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .direct-answer {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        font-weight: 500;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 20px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        font-size: 19px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n    }\n    .story-detail p {\n        line-height: 1.8;\n        color: #444;\n    }\n    .disclaimer {\n        font-size: 15px;\n        color: #666;\n        font-style: italic;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n    }\n    .faq-section {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 30px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .faq-item {\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n    }\n    .faq-question {\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-bottom: 8px;\n        font-size: 18px;\n    }\n    .faq-answer {\n        color: #555;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n    }\n    .author-box {\n        background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\n    }\n    .author-box h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-name {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-info {\n        font-size: 16px;\n        color: #555;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n        line-height: 1.4;\n    }\n    .author-box a {\n        display: inline-block;\n        background-color: #722f37;\n        color: white;\n        padding: 12px 24px;\n        text-decoration: none;\n        border-radius: 6px;\n        font-size: 16px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        border: 2px solid #722f37;\n        cursor: pointer;\n        box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3);\n        margin-top: 5px;\n    }\n    br {\n        display: none;\n    }\n    strong {\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    @media (max-width: 768px) {\n        body {\n            padding: 10px;\n        }\n        .content-container {\n            padding: 15px;\n        }\n        h2 {\n            font-size: 18px;\n        }\n        h3 {\n            font-size: 17px;\n        }\n        p, li {\n            font-size: 16px;\n        }\n        th, td {\n            font-size: 14px;\n            padding: 8px;\n        }\n    }\n    .site-container, .content-area, .entry-content {\n        padding: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .entry-content > *:first-child {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .entry-content {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .kb-row-container, .kb-column-container {\n        margin: 0;\n        padding: 0;\n    }\n<\/style>\n<p><!-- ===== Body Content ===== --><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<p>    <!-- Table of Contents --><\/p>\n<div class=\"toc\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0; margin: 0;\">\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. What Are the Legal Consequences When Illegal Dispatch Is Found in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. What Happened in the Gwangju High Court Case?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. How Did the Court Distinguish Outsourcing from Illegal Dispatch?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. Which Specific Practices Triggered the Illegal Dispatch Finding?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. How Can Companies in South Korea Reduce Illegal Dispatch Exposure?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Hook (50-80 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-hook\" style=\"padding: 15px 20px; margin-bottom: 15px; border-radius: 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p><strong>Based on a real case:<\/strong> A South Korean public utility had operated a subcontracting arrangement for 28 years. The contract said &#8220;outsourcing.&#8221; The court said otherwise. Both the trial court and the appellate court ruled against the company, leaving it obligated to directly employ hundreds of workers. The lesson: in South Korea, what a contract says matters far less than how it actually operates.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Direct Answer (40-60 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"direct-answer\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-weight: 500; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n        <strong>Key Answer:<\/strong> Under South Korean law, a subcontracting agreement is recharacterized as illegal labor dispatch when the principal issues binding operational instructions, controls staffing decisions, and audits and disciplines the contractor&#8217;s individual workers. The Gwangju High Court confirmed this standard on January 22, 2026 (Case 2023Na23653).\n    <\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Development (100-150 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-detail\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 20px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h3>How Did a 28-Year Outsourcing Contract Become an Illegal Dispatch Overnight?<\/h3>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\">\u203b This analysis is based on the published judgment of Gwangju High Court Case 2023Na23653 (Jan. 22, 2026). Party identities follow the anonymization used in the judgment.<\/p>\n<p>The principal in this case was a state-owned utility with a statutory duty to supply electricity to remote island communities across South Korea. It contracted with a related company \u2014 founded by its own retirees&#8217; association \u2014 to operate power generation and distribution facilities on 66 islands nationwide. The contract ran from 1996, renewed annually, and reached approximately KRW 64.6 billion in 2020. Although the agreement was labeled an outsourcing (\ub3c4\uae09) contract, workers filed suit arguing the real relationship was one of labor dispatch. The courts agreed. Individually, several contract features had outsourcing characteristics. But assessed as a whole, the operational reality pointed firmly toward dispatch. This ruling carries implications for any company in South Korea that relies on service contracts to staff functions it is legally required to perform.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. What Are the Legal Consequences When Illegal Dispatch Is Found in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<p>South Korea&#8217;s Act on the Protection, etc. of Dispatched Workers (the &#8220;Dispatch Act&#8221;) sets different consequences depending on which version of the statute applies and when the dispatch relationship began. The principal risk for companies is a mandatory direct employment obligation.<\/p>\n<h3>Direct Employment Obligation<\/h3>\n<p>Where illegal dispatch is confirmed for work falling outside the permitted dispatch categories listed in Article 5(1) of the Dispatch Act and the Enforcement Decree Schedule 1, the principal must directly employ the workers under Article 6-2(1)(1). If the principal refuses, the workers may sue to compel a declaration of employment (\uace0\uc6a9\uc758 \uc758\uc0ac\ud45c\uc2dc), which takes effect on the date the court judgment becomes final.<\/p>\n<h3>Deemed Employment (Pre-2007 Cases)<\/h3>\n<p>Workers whose dispatch began before the December 21, 2006 amendment of the Dispatch Act are governed by the old Article 6(3), under which they are deemed directly employed by law once two years of dispatch have elapsed \u2014 no court order is needed.<\/p>\n<h3>Statute of Limitations<\/h3>\n<p>The direct employment claim is a contractual right subject to the ten-year limitation period under Article 162(1) of the Civil Act. Critically, South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court held in its July 25, 2024 judgment (2024Da203891) that this period does not begin to run while the illegal dispatch continues. It starts only after the worker leaves the contractor. The Gwangju High Court applied this rule in 2023Na23653, rejecting the principal&#8217;s limitations defense in full.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Applicable Law<\/th>\n<th>Effect<\/th>\n<th>Trigger Point<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pre-amendment Dispatch Act, Art. 6(3)<\/td>\n<td>Deemed employment by operation of law<\/td>\n<td>Two years after dispatch commenced<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Amended \/ Current Dispatch Act, Art. 6-2(1)(1)<\/td>\n<td>Mandatory direct employment (enforceable by court order)<\/td>\n<td>Two years after dispatch commenced (or statute&#8217;s effective date)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Statute of limitations (Civil Act Art. 162(1))<\/td>\n<td>Ten-year limitation period<\/td>\n<td>Runs from date worker leaves the contractor<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. What Happened in the Gwangju High Court Case?<\/h2>\n<p>Gwangju High Court Case 2023Na23653 involved over one hundred workers employed by a contractor on 66 remote island power stations across South Korea. The workers sued the principal utility for recognition of employment status or a declaration of direct employment.<\/p>\n<h3>Structure of the Outsourcing Arrangement<\/h3>\n<p>The principal held a statutory obligation to supply electricity to these island communities under South Korean energy law. Beginning in 1996, it contracted out that responsibility to a single company whose sole shareholder was a retirees&#8217; association composed of the principal&#8217;s own former employees. Annual contract value reached approximately KRW 64.6 billion by 2020. The contractor assigned workers to each island in roles including station manager, mechanical maintenance engineer, electrical engineer, metering technician, and power plant operator.<\/p>\n<h3>Procedural History<\/h3>\n<p>The workers filed suit on March 24, 2020. The Gwangju District Court ruled entirely in their favor on June 9, 2023 (2020Gahap52448). The principal appealed, and the Gwangju High Court affirmed on January 22, 2026, dismissing the appeal in full. The appellate court conducted a factor-by-factor analysis across five contested areas and concluded that, taken together, the relationship bore the hallmarks of labor dispatch rather than genuine outsourcing.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. How Did the Court Distinguish Outsourcing from Illegal Dispatch?<\/h2>\n<p>South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court established the controlling standard in its February 26, 2015 judgment (2010Da106436): courts must examine the substance of the working relationship across five dimensions, disregarding the contract label.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Factor<\/th>\n<th>Consistent with Genuine Outsourcing<\/th>\n<th>Consistent with Illegal Dispatch<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operational instructions<\/td>\n<td>Principal directs the result, not the method<\/td>\n<td>Principal issues binding day-to-day work instructions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business integration<\/td>\n<td>Contractor operates independently<\/td>\n<td>Contractor&#8217;s workers form one operational unit with principal&#8217;s staff<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Staffing control<\/td>\n<td>Contractor decides headcount, qualifications, schedules independently<\/td>\n<td>Principal sets and controls headcount, qualifications, working hours<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scope and specialization<\/td>\n<td>Defined, bounded deliverable with genuine contractor expertise<\/td>\n<td>Open-ended, all-encompassing scope; expertise derived from principal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Independence<\/td>\n<td>Contractor has autonomous organization and self-funded equipment<\/td>\n<td>Contractor is economically dependent; principal funds operations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>The Gwangju High Court emphasized that a contract need not satisfy all dispatch indicators to be recharacterized. Where the overall balance tips toward dispatch \u2014 even if some outsourcing features are present \u2014 the court will apply the Dispatch Act.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. Which Specific Practices Triggered the Illegal Dispatch Finding?<\/h2>\n<p>The court identified five categories of evidence pointing toward dispatch. Understanding each category is essential for companies evaluating their own arrangements under South Korean law.<\/p>\n<h3>Comprehensive and Open-Ended Scope<\/h3>\n<p>The contract delegated all field operations the principal was legally required to perform on the islands. Each work category ended with a catch-all clause: &#8220;other tasks requested by the principal in the relevant area.&#8221; The court held this structure \u2014 delegating a statutory duty comprehensively rather than a specific, bounded deliverable \u2014 was characteristic of a labor supply arrangement, not a contract for a defined piece of work.<\/p>\n<h3>Principal-Authored Operations Manuals<\/h3>\n<p>The court found that the principal had created detailed procedural manuals, handbooks, and guidelines governing how each task was to be performed \u2014 not the quality of results, but the step-by-step method. Critically, the earliest manuals predated the outsourcing contract: they were documents the principal had used when it operated the facilities directly. The contractor essentially inherited those manuals and continued to follow them. The court held this practice was equivalent to direct operational supervision.<\/p>\n<h3>Daily Reporting and Real-Time Monitoring<\/h3>\n<p>Station managers submitted daily reports to the principal&#8217;s district offices every morning at 9 a.m. These reports covered not only generation and distribution performance but also individual worker attendance, leave, and visitor logs at the stations. The principal also operated a real-time integrated management system that tracked generation data around the clock. The court noted that 24-hour continuous monitoring is incompatible with a contract model premised on delivering a finished product within a defined timeframe.<\/p>\n<h3>Audits Targeting Individual Worker Conduct<\/h3>\n<p>The principal conducted regular and ad hoc audits examining individual workers&#8217; attendance records, personal work habits, vehicle usage logs, and facility cleanliness. Following audits, the principal directed the contractor to discipline specific workers \u2014 and the contractor complied. The court found this practice went beyond any legitimate outsourcing supervision right and constituted direct management of the contractor&#8217;s workforce. The court rejected the argument that standard government contract clauses granting &#8220;worker replacement rights&#8221; and &#8220;supervisory authority&#8221; authorized this level of individual personnel oversight.<\/p>\n<h3>Fee Structure Leaving No Room for Independent Profit<\/h3>\n<p>The contract reimbursed the contractor for materials, labor costs, and expenses at actual cost, with a profit margin capped by procurement regulations and further reduced by the principal&#8217;s annual performance evaluation. The contractor had no ability to negotiate the fee ceiling upward or reduce costs to improve margins. The court characterized the fee as payment for labor supply, not for the completion of defined work.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. How Can Companies in South Korea Reduce Illegal Dispatch Exposure?<\/h2>\n<p>The ruling confirms that contract language alone cannot eliminate illegal dispatch risk. South Korean courts assess operational reality. The following measures address the specific factors that proved decisive in this case.<\/p>\n<h3>Channel Instructions Through the Contractor&#8217;s Management<\/h3>\n<p>Direct communication between the principal&#8217;s staff and the contractor&#8217;s workers \u2014 whether by memo, email, or messaging apps \u2014 is a strong dispatch indicator. Instructions should flow from the principal to the contractor&#8217;s management, who then direct their own workers. This applies equally to operations manuals: if the principal drafts the manual, the principal should provide it to the contractor&#8217;s management to adapt and implement, rather than distributing it directly to field workers.<\/p>\n<h3>Give the Contractor Genuine Staffing Autonomy<\/h3>\n<p>Specifying headcount, job classifications, and qualification requirements down to the level of individual work sites \u2014 and requiring the contractor to obtain approval before making any changes \u2014 replicates the staffing control characteristic of a dispatch relationship. Contracts should define minimum statutory requirements (for example, legally mandated electrical engineer licenses) and leave the contractor free to determine how to meet them.<\/p>\n<h3>Confine Audits to Output, Not Individual Conduct<\/h3>\n<p>Auditing whether the power generation targets were met is consistent with outsourcing. Auditing individual workers&#8217; attendance records, leave documentation, and personal conduct \u2014 and then directing the contractor to discipline specific individuals \u2014 is not. Audit scope should be limited to measurable contract deliverables, and any personnel management concerns should be raised with the contractor as a systemic issue, not as a directive targeting named workers.<\/p>\n<h3>Redesign the Fee Structure to Reflect Genuine Risk Transfer<\/h3>\n<p>Where the fee simply passes through all costs with a capped margin, courts read it as payment for labor supply. A restructured fee tied to defined performance outcomes \u2014 allowing the contractor to earn more by improving efficiency, and to bear downside risk if performance falls short \u2014 better reflects the economic reality of a genuine outsourcing relationship.<\/p>\n<p>Having analyzed a number of outsourcing and labor dispatch disputes in South Korea, the consistent pattern is this: the legal exposure almost always traces back to operational habits that developed gradually over years \u2014 daily reporting routines, informal instruction channels, audit practices \u2014 rather than to any single contractual provision. Identifying and correcting those habits before litigation is far less costly than addressing them afterward.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-section\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 30px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q1. What is the legal test for illegal labor dispatch in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court (2010Da106436, Feb. 26, 2015) requires courts to assess five factors based on the substance of the relationship: whether the principal exercises binding operational control over the contractor&#8217;s workers; whether those workers are integrated into the principal&#8217;s business; whether the contractor retains independent staffing authority; whether the contract covers a defined and specialized deliverable; and whether the contractor maintains an independent organization and equipment base. No single factor is conclusive.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q2. What must a South Korean company do once illegal dispatch is confirmed?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. For work outside the permitted categories in the Dispatch Act Enforcement Decree Schedule 1, the principal must directly employ the dispatched workers under Article 6-2(1)(1) of the Dispatch Act. Refusal entitles the workers to sue for a court-ordered declaration of employment, which becomes effective on the judgment&#8217;s finality date. Under the pre-2007 statute, workers were deemed employed by law once two years elapsed, with no court order needed.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q3. Does the statute of limitations apply to direct employment claims under South Korea&#8217;s Dispatch Act?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes, a ten-year limitation period applies under Civil Act Article 162(1). However, the Supreme Court confirmed in 2024Da203891 (Jul. 25, 2024) that the period does not run while the illegal dispatch persists \u2014 it begins only when the worker leaves the contractor. The Gwangju High Court applied this rule in Case 2023Na23653 to reject the principal&#8217;s limitations defense.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q4. Can a company still face illegal dispatch liability in South Korea even if the contractor has its own corporate structure and equipment?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. The court in 2023Na23653 acknowledged the contractor&#8217;s independent corporate structure and assets but found illegal dispatch nonetheless, because the contractor&#8217;s technical expertise was built through the principal&#8217;s training, the contractor&#8217;s revenue was overwhelmingly dependent on the single contract, and the principal effectively funded the contractor&#8217;s operations through cost reimbursement. These factors outweighed the contractor&#8217;s nominal independence.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q5. Is a service fee proportional to headcount a sign of illegal dispatch under South Korean law?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. It is a significant indicator. The court in 2023Na23653 held that when the fee is structured as reimbursement of actual costs plus a capped margin \u2014 leaving the contractor no realistic ability to generate independent profit through its own efficiency \u2014 the fee resembles payment for labor supply rather than payment for a completed deliverable. This is treated as one factor among several in the overall assessment.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q6. Does South Korea&#8217;s Dispatch Act apply to public enterprises and government-owned corporations?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. The Dispatch Act applies equally to public enterprises. The principal in this case was a public corporation in which the Korean government held more than 51% of shares, yet the courts found the Dispatch Act fully applicable and imposed a direct employment obligation. The public nature of the principal did not affect the legal analysis.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q7. Can detailed work instructions provided to a contractor constitute illegal dispatch supervision in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes, if the instructions go beyond defining the expected result and instead govern the step-by-step method of performing each task. The court in 2023Na23653 found that principal-authored operational manuals specifying exactly how each job role should perform each function \u2014 rather than what output was required \u2014 had the same practical effect as direct dispatch supervision, regardless of whether those instructions were issued in real time.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\" style=\"margin: 20px 0;\">\u203b This article is provided for general informational purposes based on the published judgment of Gwangju High Court Case 2023Na23653 (Jan. 22, 2026). The legal analysis of any specific situation depends on its particular facts and circumstances. This article does not constitute legal advice, and companies facing outsourcing or labor dispatch questions should consult a qualified attorney.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Author Box --><\/p>\n<div class=\"author-box\" style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\">\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<div class=\"author-name\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Corporate advisory, corporate disputes &amp; corporate criminal defense<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Former Prosecutor | Judicial Research and Training Institute, 33rd Class<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">LL.B. &amp; LL.M. in Criminal Law, Korea University | LL.M., University of California, Davis School of Law<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Visit Atlas Legal<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. What Are the Legal Consequences When Illegal Dispatch Is Found in South Korea? 2. What Happened in the Gwangju High Court Case? 3. How Did the Court Distinguish Outsourcing from Illegal Dispatch? 4. Which Specific Practices Triggered the Illegal Dispatch Finding? 5. How Can Companies in South Korea Reduce Illegal Dispatch&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[218,15,690],"tags":[501,498,499,500,502],"class_list":["post-657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corporate-counseling","category-corporate","category-employment-labor","tag-disguised-subcontracting","tag-illegal-dispatch-south-korea","tag-labor-dispatch-act-korea","tag-outsourcing-contract-korea","tag-south-korea-employment-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2457,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"disguised subcontracting\",\"illegal dispatch South Korea\",\"labor dispatch Act Korea\",\"outsourcing contract Korea\",\"South Korea employment law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Corporate Counseling\",\"Corporate\\\/International\",\"Employment &amp; Labor\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"South Korea's Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","description":"South Korea's Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","og_description":"South Korea's Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea?","datePublished":"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/"},"wordCount":2457,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["disguised subcontracting","illegal dispatch South Korea","labor dispatch Act Korea","outsourcing contract Korea","South Korea employment law"],"articleSection":["Corporate Counseling","Corporate\/International","Employment &amp; Labor"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/","name":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea? | Atlas Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-06T23:22:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-27T00:11:29+00:00","description":"South Korea's Gwangju High Court (2023Na23653, 2026) recharacterized a 28-year outsourcing contract as illegal dispatch. Learn the five-factor test and how companies can reduce their exposure.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/illegal-dispatch-outsourcing-south-korea-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When Does Outsourcing Become Illegal Dispatch in South Korea?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=657"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/657\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1269,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/657\/revisions\/1269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}