{"id":651,"date":"2026-03-05T21:46:21","date_gmt":"2026-03-05T21:46:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=651"},"modified":"2026-03-05T21:46:21","modified_gmt":"2026-03-05T21:46:21","slug":"trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ===== Schema Markup ===== --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Article Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"Article\",\n    \"headline\": \"Can a Trust Company Cap Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling Explained\",\n    \"description\": \"South Korea's Supreme Court (Case 2023Da280945, Feb. 26, 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is a 'material term' under the Standard Terms Act. If the trustee fails to explain it, the clause cannot be enforced against buyers.\",\n    \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"\ubc15\uc18c\uc601\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"Attorney at Law\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n            \"@type\": \"LegalService\",\n            \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n            \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n            \"address\": {\n                \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n                \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n                \"addressRegion\": \"Songdo\"\n            }\n        }\n    },\n    \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\"\n    },\n    \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-06\",\n    \"dateModified\": \"2026-03-06\",\n    \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n        \"@type\": \"WebPage\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- FAQ Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n    \"mainEntity\": [\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What is a liability-limitation clause in a South Korean land trust supply contract?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"A liability-limitation clause (\ucc45\uc784\ud55c\uc815\ud2b9\uc57d) is a special provision inserted into a supply contract by the trustee (trust company), stating that its contractual liability is limited to the scope of the trust assets. If valid, this prevents the buyer from pursuing the trustee's own proprietary assets to satisfy a claim.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What happens if a trust company fails to explain the liability-limitation clause to a buyer in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Under the Supreme Court's ruling in Case 2023Da280945 (Feb. 26, 2026), the liability-limitation clause qualifies as a 'material term' under Article 3(3) of the Standard Terms Act. If the trust company does not provide a specific and detailed explanation of the clause, it cannot invoke that clause as part of the contract (Article 3(4) of the Standard Terms Act). The trustee reverts to full liability, including its own proprietary assets.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What is the default liability of a trustee toward unit buyers under South Korean law?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"The default rule, established by the Supreme Court in Case 2004Da31883\/31890 (Oct. 15, 2004) and reaffirmed in the 2026 ruling, is that a trustee in a management-type land trust bears liability to unit buyers both from the trust assets and from its own proprietary assets for obligations arising from the trust's operations.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Does widespread industry use of the clause exempt the trustee from the explanation duty?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"No. The Supreme Court held that even if liability-limitation clauses are commonly used in the trust industry, a typical unit buyer \u2014 who may engage in real estate transactions only a few times in a lifetime and lacks specialist knowledge of land trust structures \u2014 cannot reasonably be expected to anticipate the clause's existence and effect without a separate explanation.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"How can a trust company demonstrate it has fulfilled its explanation duty in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Based on lower court decisions, the duty is more likely to be satisfied when: (1) the liability-limitation clause is visually distinguished from other contract terms by a separate box or different typeface; (2) the buyer signs or initials a specific acknowledgment box that sets out the clause's content in concrete terms; and (3) there is documentary evidence from the sales process showing the buyer was informed of the management-type land trust structure. A blanket confirmation signature alone is generally insufficient.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"When does a buyer's right to claim penalty damages arise after canceling a supply contract in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"The Supreme Court confirmed in this case that the penalty damages claim becomes due and payable at the moment the notice of contract cancellation reaches the trustee. The trustee's argument that payment should be deferred until all trust administration costs are settled was rejected.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What is the broader significance of the 2026 Supreme Court ruling for land trust disputes in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"The ruling resolves a split among lower courts and establishes a clear standard: trust companies must provide specific, concrete explanations of liability-limitation clauses \u2014 not merely include a general confirmation signature \u2014 to validly invoke them. This strengthens buyer protection in South Korean real estate transactions involving management-type land trusts.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What should a buyer do if their supply contract already contains a liability-limitation clause in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"If the buyer was not given a specific explanation of the clause at the time of contracting, there may be grounds to challenge its enforceability under Article 3(4) of the Standard Terms Act. Key factors to review include whether the clause was visually distinguished in the contract, whether the buyer signed a specific acknowledgment, and whether any explanation was provided during the sales process. Consulting a lawyer to assess the specific facts is strongly recommended.\"\n            }\n        }\n    ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- LocalBusiness Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"LocalBusiness\",\n    \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/logo.png\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n    \"telephone\": \"+82-32-864-8300\",\n    \"address\": {\n        \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n        \"streetAddress\": \"323 Incheon Tower-daero, B-dong, Suite 2901 (Songdo-dong, Centroad)\",\n        \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n        \"addressRegion\": \"\uc778\ucc9c\uad11\uc5ed\uc2dc \uc5f0\uc218\uad6c\",\n        \"addressCountry\": \"KR\"\n    },\n    \"priceRange\": \"$$\",\n    \"openingHoursSpecification\": {\n        \"@type\": \"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\n        \"dayOfWeek\": [\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\"],\n        \"opens\": \"09:00\",\n        \"closes\": \"18:00\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- ===== CSS ===== --><\/p>\n<style>\n    body {\n        font-family: Georgia, serif;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        max-width: 1000px;\n        margin: 0 auto;\n        padding: 20px;\n        background-color: #f9f9f9;\n    }\n    .content-container {\n        background-color: white;\n        padding: 20px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    h2 {\n        font-size: 22px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    h3 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #34495e;\n        margin-top: 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    p, li {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n    }\n    ul, ol {\n        padding-left: 25px;\n        margin: 10px 0;\n    }\n    li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    table {\n        width: 100%;\n        border-collapse: collapse;\n        margin: 15px 0;\n    }\n    th, td {\n        border: 1px solid #ddd;\n        padding: 10px;\n        text-align: left;\n        font-size: 16px;\n    }\n    th {\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .toc {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .toc h2 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    .toc ul {\n        list-style-type: none;\n        padding-left: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .toc ul li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .toc a {\n        text-decoration: none !important;\n        color: #3498db;\n        border-bottom: none !important;\n    }\n    .toc a:hover {\n        text-decoration: underline;\n    }\n    .story-hook {\n        padding: 15px 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-hook p {\n        font-style: italic;\n        color: #555;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .direct-answer {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        font-weight: 500;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 20px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        font-size: 19px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n    }\n    .story-detail p {\n        line-height: 1.8;\n        color: #444;\n    }\n    .disclaimer {\n        font-size: 15px;\n        color: #666;\n        font-style: italic;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n    }\n    .faq-section {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 30px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .faq-item {\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n    }\n    .faq-question {\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-bottom: 8px;\n        font-size: 18px;\n    }\n    .faq-answer {\n        color: #555;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n    }\n    .author-box {\n        background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\n    }\n    .author-box h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-name {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-info {\n        font-size: 16px;\n        color: #555;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n        line-height: 1.4;\n    }\n    .author-box a {\n        display: inline-block;\n        background-color: #722f37;\n        color: white;\n        padding: 12px 24px;\n        text-decoration: none;\n        border-radius: 6px;\n        font-size: 16px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        border: 2px solid #722f37;\n        cursor: pointer;\n        box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3);\n        margin-top: 5px;\n    }\n    br {\n        display: none;\n    }\n    strong {\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    @media (max-width: 768px) {\n        body { padding: 10px; }\n        .content-container { padding: 15px; }\n        h2 { font-size: 18px; }\n        h3 { font-size: 17px; }\n        p, li { font-size: 16px; }\n        th, td { font-size: 14px; padding: 8px; }\n    }\n    .site-container, .content-area, .entry-content {\n        padding: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .entry-content > *:first-child {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .entry-content {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .kb-row-container, .kb-column-container {\n        margin: 0;\n        padding: 0;\n    }\n<\/style>\n<p><!-- ===== Content ===== --><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<p>    <!-- Table of Contents --><\/p>\n<div class=\"toc\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0; margin: 0;\">\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. What Does a Trustee&#8217;s Liability Actually Cover Under South Korean Law?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. What Is a Liability-Limitation Clause and Why Does It Matter?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. How Did South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court Rule on the Explanation Duty?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. What Does Fulfilling \u2014 or Failing \u2014 the Explanation Duty Look Like in Practice?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. What Are the Practical Takeaways for Trustees and Buyers?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Hook (~70 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-hook\" style=\"padding: 15px 20px; margin-bottom: 15px; border-radius: 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p><strong>Case scenario:<\/strong> A buyer in South Korea signed a supply contract for an officetel unit managed under a land trust structure, paid the deposit, and waited for the handover date. When the developer fell behind schedule by more than three months, the buyer cancelled the contract and demanded a refund plus penalty damages \u2014 only to be told by the trust company that its liability was &#8220;limited to the trust assets.&#8221; Was that defense legally sound?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Direct Answer (~55 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"direct-answer\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-weight: 500; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n        <strong>Short answer:<\/strong> No \u2014 not unless the trust company had properly explained that clause to the buyer at the time of contracting. South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court ruled on February 26, 2026 (Case 2023Da280945) that a liability-limitation clause is a &#8220;material term&#8221; under the Standard Terms Act and is unenforceable if the trustee failed to explain it specifically and in detail.\n    <\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Development (~130 words) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-detail\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 20px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h3>Why the Supreme Court Unanimously Dismissed the Trust Company&#8217;s Appeal<\/h3>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\">\u203b The analysis below is based on the full text of Supreme Court Decision 2023Da280945 (Feb. 26, 2026) and related lower court materials. Legal outcomes may differ depending on the specific facts of each case.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the trust company (defendant) had embedded a liability-limitation clause in the special provisions of the supply contract, stating that the seller&#8217;s liability was confined to the trust assets and the scope of the trust agreement. Both the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court 2022Na2048531, Aug. 31, 2023) and the Supreme Court found no evidence that the trust company had specifically explained this clause to the buyer. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous ruling, affirmed the lower court&#8217;s conclusion and dismissed the appeal, settling a question that had divided lower courts for years.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Section 1 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. What Does a Trustee&#8217;s Liability Actually Cover Under South Korean Law?<\/h2>\n<p>Under South Korean law, a trustee in a management-type land trust (\uad00\ub9ac\ud615 \ud1a0\uc9c0\uc2e0\ud0c1) bears liability to unit buyers not only from the trust assets, but also from its own proprietary assets, for obligations arising from the trust&#8217;s operations. This default rule was established by the Supreme Court in Case 2004Da31883\/31890 (Oct. 15, 2004) and was reaffirmed in the 2026 ruling.<\/p>\n<h3>How the Management-Type Land Trust Structure Works<\/h3>\n<p>In a management-type land trust, the developer (settlor) remains the driving force behind the project, while the trust company (trustee) takes legal title to the land and assumes the role of seller by succeeding to the developer&#8217;s position. In this case, the trust company entered into a management-type land trust agreement in March 2018 and formally succeeded to the developer and seller positions.<\/p>\n<p>Under this arrangement, buyers enter into supply contracts directly with the trust company. Since the trust company has stepped into the seller&#8217;s shoes, it is the party that bears contractual responsibility if performance fails. Restricting that liability to the trust assets alone requires an express contractual clause \u2014 and as the Supreme Court confirmed, that clause must be properly explained.<\/p>\n<h3>Default Liability vs. Liability-Limitation Clause: A Comparison<\/h3>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Category<\/th>\n<th>Default Rule (No Clause)<\/th>\n<th>With Liability-Limitation Clause (If Valid)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scope of liability<\/td>\n<td>Trust assets + trustee&#8217;s own proprietary assets<\/td>\n<td>Trust assets only<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Legal basis<\/td>\n<td>Supreme Court 2004Da31883\/31890<\/td>\n<td>Contractual clause (subject to explanation duty)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Buyer protection<\/td>\n<td>Higher \u2014 additional recourse available<\/td>\n<td>Lower \u2014 no recovery once trust assets are exhausted<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>    <!-- Section 2 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. What Is a Liability-Limitation Clause and Why Does It Matter?<\/h2>\n<p>A liability-limitation clause is a special provision inserted into the supply contract by the trust company as seller, providing that even where the seller bears contractual liability, that liability extends only to the trust assets and the scope of the trust agreement. If this clause is validly incorporated into the contract, a buyer who wins a claim for a deposit refund or penalty damages may find nothing left to collect if the trust assets have already been depleted.<\/p>\n<h3>The Real-World Risk for Buyers<\/h3>\n<p>Without the clause, the trust company&#8217;s own proprietary assets remain available for enforcement. With a valid clause, buyers are confined to the trust assets. In a depressed property market \u2014 where sales volumes are low or construction costs have overrun \u2014 the trust assets may be entirely consumed by the time a buyer tries to recover. This is precisely why the clause so significantly affects a buyer&#8217;s decision to enter the contract in the first place.<\/p>\n<h3>The Standard Terms Act Framework<\/h3>\n<div style=\"padding: 15px 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 15px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Standard Terms Act (\uc57d\uad00\uc758 \uaddc\uc81c\uc5d0 \uad00\ud55c \ubc95\ub960), Article 3 \u2014 Drafting and Explanation Duties<\/p>\n<p>Article 3(1): A business operator shall draft terms and conditions in Korean using standardized and systematic language, and shall make important provisions clearly identifiable through symbols, colors, bold or enlarged text, or similar means.<\/p>\n<p>Article 3(2): When concluding a contract, a business operator shall clearly disclose the content of the terms and conditions to the customer in a manner generally expected for that type of contract, and shall provide a copy upon request. (Certain regulated industries are exempt.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article 3(3): A business operator shall explain the material provisions of the terms and conditions to the customer in a manner the customer can understand.<\/strong> This obligation does not apply where explanation is significantly impracticable given the nature of the contract.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article 3(4): Where a business operator concludes a contract in violation of paragraphs (2) or (3), it may not assert those provisions as part of the contract.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The central question in this case was whether the liability-limitation clause qualified as a &#8220;material provision&#8221; within the meaning of Article 3(3). If it did \u2014 and the explanation duty was not fulfilled \u2014 Article 3(4) would render the clause unenforceable.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 3 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. How Did South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court Rule on the Explanation Duty?<\/h2>\n<p>The Supreme Court held that a liability-limitation clause of this type is, absent special circumstances, a &#8220;material provision&#8221; within the meaning of Article 3(3) of the Standard Terms Act, triggering the explanation duty (Supreme Court, Case 2023Da280945, Feb. 26, 2026).<\/p>\n<h3>The Legal Standard for &#8220;Material Provisions&#8221;<\/h3>\n<p>The Court reiterated that a &#8220;material provision&#8221; is one that, judged by common social standards, could directly influence a customer&#8217;s decision to enter into the contract or to agree to the stated price (Supreme Court Decision 2007Ma1328, Dec. 16, 2008). The purpose of the explanation duty, the Court noted, is to prevent customers from being bound by significant terms they were unaware of, thereby suffering unforeseen prejudice.<\/p>\n<p>The Court also confirmed that the explanation duty does not apply to terms that are so standard and universal in a given industry that a customer could reasonably anticipate them without any explanation, or to terms that merely restate existing statutory provisions (Supreme Court 2013Da217108, Jul. 24, 2014; Supreme Court 2016Da277200, Jan. 17, 2019).<\/p>\n<h3>Two Reasons the Clause Was Found to Be &#8220;Material&#8221;<\/h3>\n<p>First, the liability-limitation clause directly restricts the trustee&#8217;s default obligation to satisfy claims from both the trust assets and its own proprietary assets. Because this directly affects whether a buyer would choose to enter the contract or at what price, it falls squarely within the definition of a material provision.<\/p>\n<p>Second, even if such clauses are common practice in the trust industry, a typical buyer \u2014 who concludes real estate transactions perhaps a handful of times in a lifetime and has no specialist knowledge of management-type land trust structures \u2014 cannot reasonably be expected to anticipate the clause&#8217;s existence and effect without a separate explanation.<\/p>\n<h3>Industry Practice vs. Individual Predictability: Two Separate Tests<\/h3>\n<p>The Court drew a clear distinction between the two grounds for exempting a business operator from the explanation duty (Supreme Court 2016Da276177, May 30, 2019). Whether a term is &#8220;general and common in the relevant industry&#8221; is assessed by looking at whether the clause is widely used in that sector. Whether a customer &#8220;could sufficiently have anticipated&#8221; the term is assessed on an individualized basis, by reference to the particular customer in the litigation. The fact that the clause is industry-standard does not automatically mean any given buyer could have foreseen it.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 4 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. What Does Fulfilling \u2014 or Failing \u2014 the Explanation Duty Look Like in Practice?<\/h2>\n<p>Before this Supreme Court ruling, lower courts had reached conflicting conclusions on whether the explanation duty had been satisfied in individual cases. Analyzing those decisions, three recurring factors shaped the outcome.<\/p>\n<h3>How Courts Have Distinguished Compliance from Non-Compliance<\/h3>\n<p>The first factor is the <strong>visual presentation of the clause within the contract<\/strong>. Where the liability-limitation clause appeared in the same typeface and font size as all other provisions, with nothing to draw the reader&#8217;s attention, courts tended to find that the explanation duty had not been met. By contrast, where the clause was set apart in a separate box or displayed in a distinctive format, courts were more likely to recognize at least partial compliance.<\/p>\n<p>The second factor is <strong>how the buyer&#8217;s acknowledgment was recorded<\/strong>. A generic blanket confirmation signature \u2014 covering all special provisions without specifying the content of the liability-limitation clause \u2014 has consistently been treated as insufficient. Compliance was more readily found where the clause&#8217;s substance was set out in a dedicated acknowledgment field that the buyer signed or initialed specifically.<\/p>\n<p>The third factor is <strong>evidence of an actual explanation during the sales process<\/strong>. Where the trust company could produce no materials showing that the clause had been addressed during the sales presentation or at the point of signing, violation was found. Conversely, where the buyer could be shown to have understood that the transaction involved a management-type land trust structure and had recorded that understanding in their own handwriting, courts were more willing to treat the duty as fulfilled.<\/p>\n<h3>The Stricter Standard After the 2026 Ruling<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling makes clear that a blanket confirmation or a general stamp of acknowledgment is no longer adequate. To validly invoke a liability-limitation clause going forward, trust companies must be able to demonstrate that the buyer was given a specific, concrete, and individually intelligible explanation of both the content and the legal consequences of the clause.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 5 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. What Are the Practical Takeaways for Trustees and Buyers?<\/h2>\n<p>This ruling carries significant implications for both sides of a management-type land trust supply contract.<\/p>\n<h3>For Trust Companies<\/h3>\n<p>Trust companies seeking to validly rely on a liability-limitation clause going forward should consider three things. First, the clause should be visually separated from the surrounding contract text in a way that makes it conspicuous. Second, the buyer should sign or initial a specific acknowledgment confirming they have read and understood the clause&#8217;s content and its legal effect \u2014 not merely a generic &#8220;I have read and agree&#8221; box. Third, any oral explanations given during the sales process should be documented in writing and preserved as contemporaneous evidence.<\/p>\n<h3>For Unit Buyers<\/h3>\n<p>Buyers who signed a supply contract containing a liability-limitation clause without receiving a proper explanation now have a stronger basis to challenge the clause&#8217;s enforceability. If there was no individualized explanation, no dedicated acknowledgment signature, and no contemporaneous record of the clause being discussed, Article 3(4) of the Standard Terms Act may prevent the trust company from relying on it. In that scenario, the trustee&#8217;s full liability \u2014 including its proprietary assets \u2014 remains in play.<\/p>\n<h3>On the Timing of Penalty Damages Claims<\/h3>\n<p>The Court also addressed a secondary issue in this case: when does a penalty damages claim become due? The trust company argued that payment should be deferred until all trust administration costs had been settled. The Court rejected this, holding that the buyer&#8217;s right to penalty damages matures at the moment the cancellation notice reaches the trustee \u2014 not at some later point contingent on the trust&#8217;s internal accounting.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- FAQ --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-section\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 30px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q1. What is a liability-limitation clause in a South Korean land trust supply contract?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. It is a special contractual provision by which the trust company, acting as seller, states that its liability under the supply contract is limited to the trust assets and the scope of the trust agreement \u2014 meaning the buyer cannot pursue the trust company&#8217;s own proprietary assets to satisfy any claim.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q2. What happens if the trust company does not explain the clause?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Under the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in Case 2023Da280945, the clause qualifies as a &#8220;material provision&#8221; under Article 3(3) of the Standard Terms Act. If the trust company fails to provide a specific and detailed explanation, Article 3(4) prevents it from invoking the clause as part of the contract. The trustee then bears full liability, including from its proprietary assets.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q3. What is the default liability rule for a trustee toward unit buyers in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. The default rule, established in Supreme Court Case 2004Da31883\/31890 and reaffirmed in the 2026 decision, is that the trustee is liable to buyers from both the trust assets and its own proprietary assets for obligations arising in connection with the trust&#8217;s operations. The liability-limitation clause is a contractual departure from this default.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q4. Does it matter that liability-limitation clauses are standard practice in the South Korean trust industry?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. No. The Court distinguished between whether a clause is industry-standard (a question about market practice in general) and whether a specific buyer could have anticipated it (a question about that individual&#8217;s knowledge and experience). A typical buyer with no specialist background in land trust structures cannot be presumed to know about such a clause simply because it is common in the industry.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q5. How can a trust company demonstrate it has satisfied the explanation duty?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Based on patterns in lower court decisions, compliance is more likely to be recognized where the clause is visually set apart in the contract, the buyer signs a dedicated acknowledgment that reflects the clause&#8217;s specific content, and there is contemporaneous written evidence that the clause was addressed during the sales process. A boilerplate signature on general terms is not sufficient on its own.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q6. What rights does a buyer have if the developer causes delayed handover in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Where the supply contract entitles the buyer to cancel if the handover date is missed by more than three months due to the seller&#8217;s fault, the buyer may cancel, demand a deposit refund, and claim penalty damages. The Supreme Court confirmed that the penalty damages claim matures when the cancellation notice reaches the other party, with no deferral for trust administration costs.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q7. What is the broader significance of this ruling for real estate transactions in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. The ruling settles a long-running split among lower courts and sets a clear, buyer-protective standard: trust companies must give individualized, substantive explanations of liability-limitation clauses. It reinforces the protective function of the Standard Terms Act in real estate transactions involving management-type land trusts, which are common in South Korea&#8217;s condominium and officetel markets.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q8. What should a buyer do if their existing contract already contains a liability-limitation clause?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. If the buyer received no meaningful explanation of the clause at the time of signing, there may be grounds to challenge its enforceability under Article 3(4) of the Standard Terms Act. The key questions are whether the clause was visually distinct in the contract, whether any specific acknowledgment was signed, and whether any explanation was given during the sales process. A lawyer experienced in South Korean real estate and trust law should be consulted to assess the particular facts.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Experience note --><\/p>\n<p>Cases where the Standard Terms Act intersects with trust law principles \u2014 as in this Supreme Court ruling \u2014 require careful analysis of both the contract&#8217;s documentary record and the applicable legal framework. Our practice at Atlas Legal covers construction and real estate disputes in South Korea, including supply contract disputes involving management-type land trusts, liability-limitation clause challenges, and delayed handover claims.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\" style=\"margin: 20px 0;\">\u203b The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The applicable legal analysis may differ depending on the specific facts of an individual case. For advice on a particular matter, please consult a qualified attorney.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Author Box (Park Soyoung) --><\/p>\n<div class=\"author-box\" style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\">\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<div class=\"author-name\">Park Soyoung | Attorney at Law<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Construction &amp; Real Estate Disputes, Family Law, and Inheritance<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">33rd Class, Judicial Research and Training Institute<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Korea University School of Law<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Visit Atlas Legal<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. What Does a Trustee&#8217;s Liability Actually Cover Under South Korean Law? 2. What Is a Liability-Limitation Clause and Why Does It Matter? 3. How Did South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court Rule on the Explanation Duty? 4. What Does Fulfilling \u2014 or Failing \u2014 the Explanation Duty Look Like in Practice? 5. What&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,218,15],"tags":[489,490,492,491,493],"class_list":["post-651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil","category-corporate-counseling","category-corporate","tag-land-trust-south-korea","tag-liability-limitation-clause","tag-real-estate-dispute-south-korea","tag-standard-terms-act","tag-unit-buyer-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2694,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"land trust South Korea\",\"liability limitation clause\",\"real estate dispute South Korea\",\"Standard Terms Act\",\"unit buyer rights\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil\\\/Administrative\",\"Corporate Counseling\",\"Corporate\\\/International\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/\",\"name\":\"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00\",\"description\":\"South Korea's Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal","description":"South Korea's Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal","og_description":"South Korea's Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling","datePublished":"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/"},"wordCount":2694,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["land trust South Korea","liability limitation clause","real estate dispute South Korea","Standard Terms Act","unit buyer rights"],"articleSection":["Civil\/Administrative","Corporate Counseling","Corporate\/International"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/","name":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling | Atlas Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-05T21:46:21+00:00","description":"South Korea's Supreme Court (2023Da280945, Feb. 2026) ruled that a liability-limitation clause in a land trust supply contract is unenforceable unless the trust company specifically explained it to the buyer. Analysis of the ruling and practical implications.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/trust-liability-limitation-clause-south-korea\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can a Trust Company Limit Its Liability to Unit Buyers in South Korea? Supreme Court 2026 Ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=651"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":652,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/651\/revisions\/652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}