{"id":506,"date":"2026-02-17T23:39:32","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T23:39:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=506"},"modified":"2026-02-25T04:54:22","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T04:54:22","slug":"performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Article Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"Article\",\n    \"headline\": \"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal\",\n    \"description\": \"South Korea's Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.\",\n    \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Taejin Kim\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"Attorney at Law\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n            \"@type\": \"LegalService\",\n            \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n            \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n            \"address\": {\n                \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n                \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n                \"addressRegion\": \"Songdo\"\n            }\n        }\n    },\n    \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\"\n    },\n    \"datePublished\": \"2026-02-18\",\n    \"dateModified\": \"2026-02-18\",\n    \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n        \"@type\": \"WebPage\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- FAQ Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n    \"mainEntity\": [\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"How much can severance pay increase if performance bonuses are included in the average wage in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"It depends on the bonus amount and years of service. For example, if an annual bonus of KRW 8 million is included in the average wage, the monthly average wage increases by approximately KRW 667,000. For an employee with 20 years of service, this could result in an additional KRW 13 million in severance pay. However, this only applies to bonuses that meet the legal criteria for wage classification.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Are all performance bonuses in South Korea now included in severance pay calculations?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"No. The Supreme Court distinguished between different types of bonuses. Only bonuses with pre-determined payment criteria specified in employment rules and paid on a regular, continuous basis (such as Samsung Electronics' Target Achievement Incentive) were recognized as average wages. Bonuses distributed based on post-hoc business performance (such as profit-sharing incentives) were not recognized as wages.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What are the three criteria for determining whether a performance bonus qualifies as an average wage under South Korean law?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"The Supreme Court applies three criteria: (1) Consideration for labor \u2014 the obligation to pay must be directly or closely related to the provision of labor; (2) Continuous and regular payment \u2014 the bonus must be paid periodically, not on a one-time or incidental basis; (3) Employer's obligation to pay \u2014 the payment obligation must be established by collective agreements, employment rules, salary regulations, or labor practices.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What should companies operating in South Korea do after this ruling?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Companies should urgently review their performance bonus systems against the criteria established by the Supreme Court. Key areas to examine include: clarity of payment provisions in employment rules, whether payment criteria are pre-determined, regularity and continuity of payments, and whether employees can control target achievement. Companies should also assess financial risks including retroactive severance pay differentials, reserve adjustments, and future labor cost restructuring.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What is the difference between average wage and ordinary wage in South Korean labor law?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Average wage is calculated by dividing total wages paid during the three months prior to the triggering event by the total number of days in that period, and serves as the basis for severance pay calculations (Article 2(1)(vi) of the Labor Standards Act). Ordinary wage refers to compensation paid regularly, uniformly, and on a fixed basis for prescribed working hours, and is used to calculate overtime pay. This Supreme Court ruling addressed the inclusion of bonuses in 'average wage' calculations, which is a separate issue from ordinary wage.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Can former employees of other large South Korean companies also file lawsuits after this ruling?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Yes. Since this ruling established specific criteria for determining whether performance bonuses qualify as average wages, former employees of companies with similar bonus systems can file claims for severance pay differentials using the same legal reasoning. In fact, 22 additional Samsung Electronics retirees filed a lawsuit within a week of the ruling. Legal experts expect similar lawsuits to spread across major corporations in South Korea.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Does this ruling affect employees who switched from DB to DC pension plans in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"For employees enrolled in Defined Benefit (DB) pension plans, changes in average wage directly affect severance pay amounts. For those who switched from DB to Defined Contribution (DC) plans, the adequacy of the severance pay settlement at the time of conversion may be challenged. Companies should review whether the average wage used to calculate severance pay at the conversion date was properly determined.\"\n            }\n        }\n    ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- LocalBusiness Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"LocalBusiness\",\n    \"name\": \"Atlas Legal\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/logo.png\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n    \"telephone\": \"+82-32-864-8300\",\n    \"address\": {\n        \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n        \"streetAddress\": \"323 Incheon Tower-daero, B-dong 2901 (Songdo-dong, Centroad)\",\n        \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n        \"addressRegion\": \"Yeonsu-gu, Incheon\",\n        \"addressCountry\": \"KR\"\n    },\n    \"priceRange\": \"$$\",\n    \"openingHoursSpecification\": {\n        \"@type\": \"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\n        \"dayOfWeek\": [\n            \"Monday\",\n            \"Tuesday\",\n            \"Wednesday\",\n            \"Thursday\",\n            \"Friday\"\n        ],\n        \"opens\": \"09:00\",\n        \"closes\": \"18:00\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- CSS (Required - Do Not Modify) --><\/p>\n<style>\n    body {\n        font-family: Georgia, serif;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        max-width: 1000px;\n        margin: 0 auto;\n        padding: 20px;\n        background-color: #f9f9f9;\n    }\n    .content-container {\n        background-color: white;\n        padding: 20px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    h2 {\n        font-size: 22px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    h3 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #34495e;\n        margin-top: 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    p, li {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n    }\n    ul, ol {\n        padding-left: 25px;\n        margin: 10px 0;\n    }\n    li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    table {\n        width: 100%;\n        border-collapse: collapse;\n        margin: 15px 0;\n    }\n    th, td {\n        border: 1px solid #ddd;\n        padding: 10px;\n        text-align: left;\n        font-size: 16px;\n    }\n    th {\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .toc {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .toc h2 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    .toc ul {\n        list-style-type: none;\n        padding-left: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .toc ul li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .toc a {\n        text-decoration: none !important;\n        color: #3498db;\n        border-bottom: none !important;\n    }\n    .toc a:hover {\n        text-decoration: underline;\n    }\n    .story-hook {\n        padding: 15px 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-hook p {\n        font-style: italic;\n        color: #555;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .direct-answer {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        font-weight: 500;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 20px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        font-size: 19px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n    }\n    .story-detail p {\n        line-height: 1.8;\n        color: #444;\n    }\n    .disclaimer {\n        font-size: 15px;\n        color: #666;\n        font-style: italic;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n    }\n    .faq-section {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 30px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .faq-item {\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n    }\n    .faq-question {\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-bottom: 8px;\n        font-size: 18px;\n    }\n    .faq-answer {\n        color: #555;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n    }\n    .author-box {\n        background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\n    }\n    .author-box h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-name {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-info {\n        font-size: 16px;\n        color: #555;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n        line-height: 1.4;\n    }\n    .author-box a {\n        display: inline-block;\n        background-color: #722f37;\n        color: white;\n        padding: 12px 24px;\n        text-decoration: none;\n        border-radius: 6px;\n        font-size: 16px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        border: 2px solid #722f37;\n        cursor: pointer;\n        box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3);\n        margin-top: 5px;\n    }\n    br {\n        display: none;\n    }\n    strong {\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    @media (max-width: 768px) {\n        body {\n            padding: 10px;\n        }\n        .content-container {\n            padding: 15px;\n        }\n        h2 {\n            font-size: 18px;\n        }\n        h3 {\n            font-size: 17px;\n        }\n        p, li {\n            font-size: 16px;\n        }\n        th, td {\n            font-size: 14px;\n            padding: 8px;\n        }\n    }\n    .site-container, .content-area, .entry-content {\n        padding: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .entry-content > *:first-child {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .entry-content {\n        margin-top: 0px !important;\n    }\n    .kb-row-container, .kb-column-container {\n        margin: 0;\n        padding: 0;\n    }\n<\/style>\n<p><!-- ===== Content Start ===== --><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<p>    <!-- Table of Contents --><\/p>\n<div class=\"toc\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0; margin: 0;\">\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. Why Did the Supreme Court Reach Different Conclusions for Different Performance Bonuses?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. How Did the Bonus Systems of the Four Companies Differ?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. What Distinguishes Bonuses That Qualify as Average Wages from Those That Do Not?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. How Does the Court Distinguish &#8220;Post-Hoc Settlement of Work Performance&#8221; from &#8220;Post-Hoc Distribution of Business Profits&#8221;?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. What Should Companies Operating in South Korea Do Now?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Hook --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-hook\" style=\"padding: 15px 20px; margin-bottom: 15px; border-radius: 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p><strong>Real scenario:<\/strong> After 20 years at a major South Korean corporation, Mr. A reviewed his severance pay statement upon retirement and noticed something troubling \u2014 the performance bonuses he had received every year were entirely excluded from the calculation. On January 29, 2026, the Supreme Court of South Korea finally addressed this question. The answer: &#8220;It depends on the type of bonus.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Key Answer --><\/p>\n<div class=\"direct-answer\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-weight: 500; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n        <strong>Key Answer:<\/strong> In rulings handed down on January 29, 2026, involving Samsung Electronics, Seoul Guarantee Insurance (SGI), and LG Display, South Korea&#8217;s Supreme Court held that performance bonuses with pre-determined payment criteria that employees can control through their work (Target Achievement Incentives) must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. However, bonuses distributed based on post-hoc business performance were held not to constitute wages.\n    <\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Development --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-detail\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 20px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h3>Why Did Identical &#8220;Performance Bonuses&#8221; Receive Different Legal Treatment?<\/h3>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\">\u203b This article is based on reports from the Korea Legal Times and the Supreme Court&#8217;s official case summaries, and is intended for general informational purposes only.<\/p>\n<p>The critical takeaway from this ruling is that even when payments share the same label of &#8220;performance bonus,&#8221; their legal classification under South Korean labor law depends entirely on how they are structured. Samsung Electronics&#8217; &#8220;Target Achievement Incentive&#8221; (TAI) was paid semi-annually based on business unit financial performance and strategic objectives, with payment criteria explicitly set out in the company&#8217;s employment rules. The Supreme Court characterized this as a &#8220;post-hoc settlement of work performance.&#8221; In contrast, bonuses tied to net income, EVA (Economic Value Added), or other metrics beyond employees&#8217; control were classified as &#8220;post-hoc distribution of business profits&#8221; and were denied wage status. For companies with operations in South Korea, the practical implications of these distinctions are analyzed in detail below.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Section 1 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. Why Did the Supreme Court Reach Different Conclusions for Different Performance Bonuses?<\/h2>\n<p>The Supreme Court applied the well-established three-part test for average wage inclusion \u2014 consideration for labor, continuous and regular payment, and the employer&#8217;s obligation to pay. Rather than creating new legal doctrine, the Court examined the specific design and operational characteristics of each company&#8217;s bonus system and applied existing criteria.<\/p>\n<h3>What Is &#8220;Average Wage&#8221; Under South Korean Law?<\/h3>\n<p>Under Article 2(1)(vi) of the Labor Standards Act (LSA), &#8220;average wage&#8221; means the amount calculated by dividing the total wages paid to an employee during the three months preceding the date on which a calculation event occurs by the total number of days in that period. Since severance pay under Article 8(1) of the Employee Retirement Benefit Security Act is calculated as at least 30 days&#8217; worth of average wage per year of continuous service, whether a particular payment is included in the average wage directly impacts the severance pay amount.<\/p>\n<h3>The Three Criteria for Average Wage Inclusion<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court reaffirmed the following three criteria from its established precedents (Supreme Court Decision 2001Da53950, decided October 23, 2001; Supreme Court En Banc Decision 2016Da48785, decided August 22, 2019):<\/p>\n<p><strong>First, consideration for labor.<\/strong> The obligation to pay must arise directly from or be closely related to the provision of labor. This was the most critical issue in these cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second, continuous and regular payment.<\/strong> The payment must be made on a periodic and recurring basis, not as a one-time or incidental payment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Third, the employer&#8217;s obligation to pay.<\/strong> The payment obligation must be established through collective agreements, employment rules, salary regulations, employment contracts, or labor practices.<\/p>\n<p>The Court confirmed that all three criteria must be satisfied simultaneously for inclusion in average wage, and explicitly stated that even if a payment has been made continuously and regularly, it cannot be classified as wages if it is not consideration for labor (see Supreme Court Decision 94Da55934, decided May 12, 1995).<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 2 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. How Did the Bonus Systems of the Four Companies Differ?<\/h2>\n<p>On the same day \u2014 January 29, 2026 \u2014 the Supreme Court ruled on four types of performance bonuses across three companies: Samsung Electronics (two types), Seoul Guarantee Insurance (one type), and LG Display (one type). The structural design of each bonus was the key determinant.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Category<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Target Incentive (TAI)<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Performance Incentive (OPI)<\/th>\n<th>SGI Special Bonus<\/th>\n<th>LG Display Business Bonus<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Average Wage?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Yes<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Payment Cycle<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Semi-annual (twice\/year)<\/td>\n<td>Annual (once\/year)<\/td>\n<td>Annual (once\/year)<\/td>\n<td>Annual (once\/year)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Payment Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Business unit financial performance (70%) + strategic objectives (30%)<\/td>\n<td>20% of business unit EVA<\/td>\n<td>Insurance premiums + net income realization<\/td>\n<td>Financial performance + competitive metrics (market share, etc.)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Payment Range<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0\u2013200%<\/td>\n<td>0\u201350% (salary system) \/ 0\u2013700% (non-salary system)<\/td>\n<td>0\u2013300%<\/td>\n<td>93\u2013440%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Regulatory Basis<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>HR rules, salary\/benefits\/attendance standards<\/td>\n<td>HR rules, salary\/benefits\/attendance standards<\/td>\n<td>Salary and welfare regulations<\/td>\n<td>Not specified in employment rules or salary standards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Payment History<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Continuously paid since 1994<\/td>\n<td>Continuously paid since 2000<\/td>\n<td>2006\u20132020 (with unpaid years)<\/td>\n<td>Since 2005 (unpaid in 2006, 2011, 2018, 2019)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>As shown in the table above, only Samsung Electronics&#8217; Target Achievement Incentive was recognized as an average wage. The Samsung Electronics cases (Supreme Court Decisions 2021Da249506 and 2021Da248299, decided January 29, 2026) and the LG Display case (Supreme Court Decision 2021Da270517, decided January 29, 2026) were handled by the 2nd Civil Division (Presiding Justice Oh Kyung-mi), while the SGI case (Supreme Court Decision 2022Da255454, decided January 29, 2026) was handled by the 1st Civil Division.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 3 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. What Distinguishes Bonuses That Qualify as Average Wages from Those That Do Not?<\/h2>\n<p>A comparative analysis of the Court&#8217;s reasoning for each bonus reveals the key factors that determine average wage classification.<\/p>\n<h3>Existence of the Employer&#8217;s Payment Obligation<\/h3>\n<p>For both Samsung Electronics incentives, the payment obligation was recognized because the employment rules specified the payment basis, eligible employees, and conditions. In contrast, SGI&#8217;s employment rules reserved discretion to the CEO, and payment criteria were changed annually through labor-management negotiations; the establishment of a binding labor practice was also denied. For LG Display, no explicit basis for the business performance bonus existed in collective agreements, employment rules, or salary regulations, so the payment obligation itself was denied.<\/p>\n<h3>Consideration for Labor \u2014 The Core Issue<\/h3>\n<p>The consideration-for-labor element was the decisive factor. The Court recognized Samsung&#8217;s Target Achievement Incentive as consideration for labor for the following reasons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Direct and close relationship to the provision of labor<\/li>\n<li>Employees could control target achievement through collective effort<\/li>\n<li>The bonus functioned as compensation for collaborative group work<\/li>\n<li>Payment amounts were pre-determined to a degree as fixed sums<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Conversely, the consideration-for-labor element was denied for the remaining three bonuses for these shared reasons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>EVA generation or net income realization was required as a precondition<\/li>\n<li>Factors outside the provision of labor (industry trends, market conditions, management decisions) had a greater impact on payment<\/li>\n<li>Payment was determined by factors beyond individual employees&#8217; control<\/li>\n<li>The bonuses were characterized as post-hoc distribution of business profits<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Continuous and Regular Payment<\/h3>\n<p>Both Samsung incentives were recognized as continuously and regularly paid \u2014 the Target Incentive semi-annually and the Performance Incentive annually, with fixed payment schedules. However, SGI&#8217;s bonus, though paid over many years, had unpaid years and uncertain payment prospects. LG Display also failed this test, with confirmed non-payment in 2006, 2011, 2018, and 2019.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Section 4 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. How Does the Court Distinguish &#8220;Post-Hoc Settlement of Work Performance&#8221; from &#8220;Post-Hoc Distribution of Business Profits&#8221;?<\/h2>\n<p>The most significant conceptual distinction introduced by the Court is between bonuses that represent a &#8220;post-hoc settlement of work performance&#8221; and those that constitute a &#8220;post-hoc distribution of business profits.&#8221; This distinction effectively determined the outcome in each case.<\/p>\n<h3>Post-Hoc Settlement of Work Performance (Average Wage Recognized)<\/h3>\n<p>Samsung&#8217;s Target Achievement Incentive was paid based on financial performance and strategic objective attainment at the business division and unit levels. The Court found that these targets could be achieved through the collective efforts of employees within each business unit, meaning that employees formed the primary causal relationship in achieving the targets. In other words, the bonus represented a post-hoc settlement of the results of labor already provided.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the payment range was pre-determined at 0\u2013200% of the bonus base amount, giving the payment the character of a &#8220;fixed sum&#8221; with a predictable range of variation.<\/p>\n<h3>Post-Hoc Distribution of Business Profits (Average Wage Denied)<\/h3>\n<p>The remaining three bonuses were all classified as post-hoc distributions of business profits. Samsung&#8217;s Performance Incentive was based on EVA (Economic Value Added), which represents excess profit after deducting the cost of equity capital from net income. The Court found that EVA generation and magnitude were not proportional to the quantity and quality of employees&#8217; labor, and that external factors unrelated to labor provision (market conditions, exchange rates, economic cycles) had a greater influence.<\/p>\n<p>The practical framework that emerges from these rulings can be summarized as follows:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Assessment Factor<\/th>\n<th>Post-Hoc Settlement (Wage Recognized)<\/th>\n<th>Post-Hoc Distribution (Wage Denied)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Nature of Payment Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Business unit KPIs, sales target achievement<\/td>\n<td>EVA, net income, excess profits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Employee Control<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Achievable through collective effort<\/td>\n<td>Dominated by external market factors<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Predictability of Amount<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Payment range pre-determined<\/td>\n<td>Significant fluctuation based on business results<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Payment Continuity<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Continuously paid without interruption<\/td>\n<td>Unpaid years exist<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Regulatory Basis<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Specific criteria in employment rules<\/td>\n<td>No clear provisions or discretionary decisions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>    <!-- Section 5 --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. What Should Companies Operating in South Korea Do Now?<\/h2>\n<p>This ruling demands that all companies operating in South Korea with performance bonus systems urgently assess whether their bonuses could be classified as average wages. Drawing on extensive experience in corporate advisory work, the following practical steps are recommended.<\/p>\n<h3>Structural Analysis of Your Bonus System<\/h3>\n<p>The first priority is to analyze whether your company&#8217;s performance bonus system could be evaluated as an average wage under the criteria established by the Supreme Court. Specifically, the following items should be reviewed:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Regulatory basis in employment rules:<\/strong> Determine whether the payment basis, eligible employees, and conditions for the bonus are specifically set out in employment rules or salary regulations. Greater specificity increases the likelihood of a payment obligation being recognized.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pre-determination of payment criteria:<\/strong> Assess whether payment rates or amounts are pre-determined to any degree, or whether they are decided entirely on a post-hoc basis depending on business results.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Regularity and continuity:<\/strong> Verify whether there have been any years of non-payment and whether payment timing is fixed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Employee control over target achievement:<\/strong> Analyze whether the bonus criteria are KPIs that employee groups can collectively achieve, or whether they depend on external business environment factors beyond employees&#8217; control.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Financial Risk Assessment<\/h3>\n<p>Companies should quantify the financial impact that would result from the inclusion of performance bonuses in average wage calculations. Key areas to assess include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Retroactive severance pay differentials:<\/strong> Identify the scope of retroactive claims, considering the three-year statute of limitations for severance pay claims under South Korean law.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reserve adjustments:<\/strong> Retirement benefit reserves may need to be recalculated under applicable accounting standards.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Future labor cost restructuring:<\/strong> Consider adjustments to DB pension contributions and potential redesign of bonus systems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Bonus System Redesign Considerations<\/h3>\n<p>If restructuring the bonus system in light of this ruling, companies seeking to avoid average wage classification should strengthen the post-hoc profit distribution structure based on business performance, while comprehensively reviewing the rationale, decision-making process, and payment procedures. However, system changes made solely to circumvent average wage inclusion risk creating a gap between form and substance, which courts may look through. It is advisable to secure legal compliance through labor and legal counsel before implementation.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- FAQ Section --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-section\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 30px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q1. How much can severance pay increase if performance bonuses are included in the average wage?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. It depends on the bonus amount and years of service. For example, if an annual bonus of KRW 8 million is included, the monthly average wage increases by approximately KRW 667,000, potentially adding about KRW 13 million to the severance pay of an employee with 20 years of service. This only applies to bonuses meeting the legal criteria for wage classification.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q2. Are all performance bonuses now included in severance pay calculations in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. No. The Supreme Court distinguished between bonus types. Only bonuses with pre-determined payment criteria specified in employment rules and paid on a regular, continuous basis were recognized as average wages. Bonuses distributed based on post-hoc business performance were not.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q3. What is the difference between average wage and ordinary wage under South Korean labor law?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Average wage is total wages paid during the three months before the triggering event divided by total days, used primarily for severance pay (Article 2(1)(vi), LSA). Ordinary wage refers to fixed, regular, uniform compensation for prescribed work, used for overtime pay calculations. This ruling addressed average wage inclusion only \u2014 a separate legal issue from ordinary wage.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q4. What are the three criteria for determining whether a performance bonus qualifies as an average wage?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. The Supreme Court applies three criteria: (1) consideration for labor \u2014 the payment obligation must be directly or closely related to labor provision; (2) continuous and regular payment; (3) employer&#8217;s payment obligation established by collective agreements, employment rules, or labor practices (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Da53950, decided October 23, 2001).<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q5. What should companies do after this ruling?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Urgently review your bonus system&#8217;s regulatory basis, pre-determination of criteria, regularity and continuity of payment, and employees&#8217; ability to control target achievement. Also assess financial risks including retroactive severance differentials, reserve adjustments, and future labor cost restructuring.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q6. Does this ruling affect employees who switched from DB to DC pension plans?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes, potentially. For DB-to-DC conversions, the adequacy of the severance pay settlement at the conversion date may be challenged. Companies should review whether the average wage used to calculate severance at that time was properly determined under the criteria now clarified by the Supreme Court.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q7. Can former employees of other large South Korean companies also file lawsuits?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. Within one week of the ruling, 22 additional Samsung Electronics retirees filed suit. Legal experts expect similar claims to spread across major corporations in South Korea. However, the three-year statute of limitations for severance pay claims applies, so timing is a critical consideration.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Expertise Statement --><\/p>\n<p>Atlas Legal provides comprehensive legal advisory services on performance bonus system design and severance pay disputes, drawing on extensive experience handling labor and employment matters for corporate clients operating in South Korea.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\" style=\"margin: 20px 0;\">\u203b The legal information presented in this article is intended for general guidance only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal conclusions may vary depending on the specific facts of each case. Please consult with an attorney for advice on actual legal matters.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Author Box: Taejin Kim --><\/p>\n<div class=\"author-box\" style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\">\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<div class=\"author-name\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Corporate Advisory, Corporate Disputes &#038; White-Collar Crime<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Former Prosecutor | 33rd Class, Judicial Research and Training Institute<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">LL.B &#038; LL.M. in Criminal Law, Korea University | LL.M., University of California, Davis<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/        \n\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        atlaw.kr&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener noreferrer&#8221;>Visit Atlas Legal Website<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. Why Did the Supreme Court Reach Different Conclusions for Different Performance Bonuses? 2. How Did the Bonus Systems of the Four Companies Differ? 3. What Distinguishes Bonuses That Qualify as Average Wages from Those That Do Not? 4. How Does the Court Distinguish &#8220;Post-Hoc Settlement of Work Performance&#8221; from &#8220;Post-Hoc Distribution&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[218,15],"tags":[404,339,401,402,403],"class_list":["post-506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corporate-counseling","category-corporate","tag-corporate-employment-advisory","tag-korean-labor-law","tag-performance-bonus-average-wage","tag-severance-pay-south-korea","tag-supreme-court-ruling-2026"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"South Korea&#039;s Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2442,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"corporate employment advisory\",\"Korean labor law\",\"performance bonus average wage\",\"severance pay South Korea\",\"Supreme Court ruling 2026\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Corporate Counseling\",\"Corporate\\\/International\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/\",\"name\":\"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00\",\"description\":\"South Korea's Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal","description":"South Korea's Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal","og_description":"South Korea's Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained","datePublished":"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/"},"wordCount":2442,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["corporate employment advisory","Korean labor law","performance bonus average wage","severance pay South Korea","Supreme Court ruling 2026"],"articleSection":["Corporate Counseling","Corporate\/International"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/","name":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained | Atlas Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-17T23:39:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-25T04:54:22+00:00","description":"South Korea's Supreme Court ruled that certain performance bonuses must be included in average wage calculations for severance pay. Learn the key criteria and what companies operating in South Korea should do now.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/performance-bonus-average-wage-severance-pay-south-korea\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are Performance Bonuses Included in Severance Pay in South Korea? 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Explained"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=506"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":540,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/506\/revisions\/540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}