{"id":338,"date":"2026-01-10T22:54:40","date_gmt":"2026-01-10T22:54:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=338"},"modified":"2026-05-03T08:41:59","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T08:41:59","slug":"wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &#038; Employer Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_START --><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ko\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%eb%b6%80%eb%8b%b9%ed%95%b4%ea%b3%a0-%ed%8c%90%eb%8b%a8-%ea%b8%b0%ec%a4%80%ec%9d%80-%ea%b7%bc%eb%a1%9c%ec%9e%90%c2%b7%ec%82%ac%ec%9a%a9%ec%9e%90-%ec%9e%85%ec%9e%a5%eb%b3%84-%eb%8c%80%ec%9d%91\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/\" \/><link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"x-default\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/kr-blog\/%eb%b6%80%eb%8b%b9%ed%95%b4%ea%b3%a0-%ed%8c%90%eb%8b%a8-%ea%b8%b0%ec%a4%80%ec%9d%80-%ea%b7%bc%eb%a1%9c%ec%9e%90%c2%b7%ec%82%ac%ec%9a%a9%ec%9e%90-%ec%9e%85%ec%9e%a5%eb%b3%84-%eb%8c%80%ec%9d%91\/\" \/><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_END --><br \/>\n<!--\n============================================================\nAtlas Law Firm Blog - Wrongful Termination Standards in South Korea\nAuthor: Taejin Kim, Managing Partner\n============================================================\n--><\/p>\n<p><!-- ===== Schema Markup Start ===== --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Article Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"Article\", \"headline\": \"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Legal Standards and Remedies for Employees and Employers | Atlas Law Firm\", \"description\": \"What determines the outcome of wrongful termination cases in South Korea? Learn about coerced resignation, lawful dismissal grounds, and legal remedies under the Korean Labor Standards Act with case analysis.\", \"author\": {\"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Taejin Kim\", \"jobTitle\": \"Managing Partner\", \"worksFor\": {\"@type\": \"LegalService\", \"name\": \"Atlas Law Firm\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"address\": {\"@type\": \"PostalAddress\", \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\", \"addressRegion\": \"Songdo\"}}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/taejin-kim\/#person\"}, \"publisher\": {\"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"Atlas Law Firm\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\", \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\"}, \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-11\", \"dateModified\": \"2026-01-11\", \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\"@type\": \"WebPage\"}, \"@id\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide#article\", \"keywords\": []}<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- FAQ Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n    \"mainEntity\": [\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Can a resignation letter still be considered wrongful termination in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Yes. Korean courts treat resignation letters submitted under employer coercion or pressure as unilateral termination by the employer, equivalent to wrongful dismissal.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Can an employer dismiss an employee for hiring irregularities discovered later?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Dismissal for hiring irregularities is only justified when the misconduct substantially undermined the fairness of the hiring process. Mere procedural defects are insufficient grounds.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Does a criminal acquittal automatically invalidate a dismissal in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Not necessarily. Criminal and labor proceedings apply different standards of proof. A criminal acquittal does not automatically make the dismissal wrongful under Korean labor law.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"What is the deadline for filing a wrongful termination claim in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Employees must file a remedy application with the Labor Relations Commission within 3 months of termination. Court lawsuits have no specific deadline but may be barred by the good faith doctrine if filed too late.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Who bears the burden of proof in wrongful termination cases in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"The employer bears the burden of proving that the termination was for just cause. The employee does not need to prove the termination was unjust.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Does accepting severance pay waive wrongful termination claims in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Not automatically. However, accepting severance without objection and filing suit much later may be rejected under the good faith doctrine. Always note 'under protest' when receiving severance if you intend to challenge the termination.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Can a CEO claim wrongful termination in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Generally no. CEOs are typically classified as employers, not employees, under Korean labor law. Removal by shareholders' resolution is not subject to wrongful termination protections.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Is there a statute of limitations for severance pay claims in South Korea?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Yes. Severance pay claims expire 3 years from the date of termination. While lawsuits to confirm dismissal invalidity have no deadline, wage and severance claims are subject to this 3-year limitation.\"\n            }\n        }\n    ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- LocalBusiness Schema --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"LocalBusiness\",\n    \"name\": \"Atlas Law Firm\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/logo.png\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\",\n    \"telephone\": \"+82-32-864-8300\",\n    \"address\": {\n        \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n        \"streetAddress\": \"323 Incheon Tower-daero, B-dong 2901 (Songdo-dong, Centroad)\",\n        \"addressLocality\": \"Incheon\",\n        \"addressRegion\": \"Yeonsu-gu\",\n        \"addressCountry\": \"KR\"\n    },\n    \"priceRange\": \"$$\",\n    \"openingHoursSpecification\": {\n        \"@type\": \"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\n        \"dayOfWeek\": [\n            \"Monday\",\n            \"Tuesday\",\n            \"Wednesday\",\n            \"Thursday\",\n            \"Friday\"\n        ],\n        \"opens\": \"09:00\",\n        \"closes\": \"18:00\"\n    }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><!-- ===== CSS \uc2a4\ud0c0\uc77c ===== --><\/p>\n<style>\n    body {\n        font-family: Georgia, serif;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        max-width: 1000px;\n        margin: 0 auto;\n        padding: 20px;\n        background-color: #f9f9f9;\n    }\n    .content-container {\n        background-color: white;\n        padding: 20px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    h2 {\n        font-size: 22px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    h3 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #34495e;\n        margin-top: 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    p, li {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n    }\n    ul, ol {\n        padding-left: 25px;\n        margin: 10px 0;\n    }\n    li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    \/* \ud14c\uc774\ube14 \uc2a4\ud0c0\uc77c *\/\n    table {\n        width: 100%;\n        border-collapse: collapse;\n        margin: 15px 0;\n    }\n    th, td {\n        border: 1px solid #ddd;\n        padding: 10px;\n        text-align: left;\n        font-size: 16px;\n    }\n    th {\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    \/* \ubaa9\ucc28 - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd *\/\n    .toc {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .toc h2 {\n        font-size: 20px;\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n    }\n    .toc ul {\n        list-style-type: none;\n        padding-left: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .toc ul li {\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .toc a {\n        text-decoration: none !important;\n        color: #3498db;\n        border-bottom: none !important;\n    }\n    .toc a:hover {\n        text-decoration: underline;\n    }\n    \/* \uc2a4\ud1a0\ub9ac \ud6c5 - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd *\/\n    .story-hook {\n        padding: 15px 20px;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-hook p {\n        font-style: italic;\n        color: #555;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    \/* \ud575\uc2ec \ub2f5\ubcc0 - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd *\/\n    .direct-answer {\n        padding: 15px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n        font-weight: 500;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    \/* \uc2a4\ud1a0\ub9ac \uc804\uac1c - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd *\/\n    .story-detail {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 20px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .story-detail h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        font-size: 19px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n    }\n    .story-detail p {\n        line-height: 1.8;\n        color: #444;\n    }\n    .disclaimer {\n        font-size: 15px;\n        color: #666;\n        font-style: italic;\n        margin-bottom: 15px;\n    }\n    \/* FAQ \uc139\uc158 - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd *\/\n    .faq-section {\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin: 30px 0;\n        background-color: #f5f5f5;\n    }\n    .faq-item {\n        margin-bottom: 20px;\n    }\n    .faq-question {\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        margin-bottom: 8px;\n        font-size: 18px;\n    }\n    .faq-answer {\n        color: #555;\n        font-size: 17px;\n        line-height: 1.6;\n    }\n    \/* \uc800\uc790 \uc18c\uac1c - \uc9c1\uac01, \uc605\uc740 \ud68c\uc0c9 \ubc30\uacbd, \uc587\uc740 \uc640\uc778\uc0c9 \uc67c\ucabd \uc904 *\/\n    .author-box {\n        background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        padding: 20px;\n        border-radius: 0;\n        margin-top: 30px;\n        border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\n    }\n    .author-box h3 {\n        margin-top: 0;\n        margin-bottom: 10px;\n        font-size: 20px;\n        color: #2c3e50;\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-name {\n        font-size: 18px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        color: #333;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n    }\n    .author-box .author-info {\n        font-size: 16px;\n        color: #555;\n        margin-bottom: 5px;\n        line-height: 1.4;\n    }\n    .author-box a {\n        display: inline-block;\n        background-color: #722f37;\n        color: white;\n        padding: 12px 24px;\n        text-decoration: none;\n        border-radius: 6px;\n        font-size: 16px;\n        font-weight: bold;\n        border: 2px solid #722f37;\n        cursor: pointer;\n        box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3);\n        margin-top: 5px;\n    }\n    br {\n        display: none;\n    }\n    \/* \ubaa8\ubc14\uc77c \ubc18\uc751\ud615 *\/\n    @media (max-width: 768px) {\n        body {\n            padding: 10px;\n        }\n        .content-container {\n            padding: 15px;\n        }\n        h2 {\n            font-size: 18px;\n        }\n        h3 {\n            font-size: 17px;\n        }\n        p, li {\n            font-size: 16px;\n        }\n        th, td {\n            font-size: 14px;\n            padding: 8px;\n        }\n    }\n    \/* \uc6cc\ub4dc\ud504\ub808\uc2a4 \ud14c\ub9c8 \uac04\uaca9 \uc870\uc815 *\/\n    .site-container, .content-area, .entry-content {\n        padding: 0;\n        margin: 0;\n    }\n    .entry-content > *:first-child {\n        margin-top: 0 !important;\n    }\n    .entry-content {\n        margin-top: 0px !important;\n    }\n    .kb-row-container, .kb-column-container {\n        margin: 0;\n        padding: 0;\n    }\n    strong {\n        font-weight: bold;\n    }\n<\/style>\n<p><!-- ===== Main Content ===== --><\/p>\n<div class=\"blog-content\">\n<p>    <!-- Table of Contents --><\/p>\n<div class=\"toc\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: -150px; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-size: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px;\">Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0; margin: 0;\">\n<li><a href=\"#section1\">1. What Is Wrongful Termination Under Korean Labor Law?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section2\">2. Can a Coerced Resignation Be Considered Wrongful Termination? &#8211; Employee Victory Case<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section3\">3. Is Dismissal for Hiring Irregularities Justified? &#8211; Employer Victory Case<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section4\">4. What Are the Key Differences Between the Two Rulings?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section5\">5. What Remedies Are Available for Wrongful Termination in South Korea?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section6\">6. What Is the Procedure for a Dismissal Invalidity Lawsuit?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section7\">7. What Should Employees and Employers Keep in Mind?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#section8\">8. FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Story Hook --><\/p>\n<div class=\"story-hook\" style=\"padding: 15px; border-radius: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<p style=\"margin: 0;\">Atlas Law Firm has represented employees in wrongful termination cases, securing reinstatement orders, and has also represented employers, obtaining rulings that upheld the legitimacy of dismissals. Both types of cases were decided by the Supreme Court of Korea, yet they reached opposite conclusions. What made the difference? The key lies in understanding that Korean labor law prioritizes substance over form.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section1\">1. What Is Wrongful Termination Under Korean Labor Law?<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>Wrongful termination (\ubd80\ub2f9\ud574\uace0) refers to dismissal without just cause under Article 23 of the Korean Labor Standards Act. The law requires that employers must have &#8220;justifiable reason&#8221; to terminate an employee, and the termination must follow proper procedures.<\/p>\n<h3>Legal Framework<\/h3>\n<p>Article 23(1) of the Labor Standards Act states: &#8220;An employer shall not dismiss, lay off, suspend, or transfer an employee, reduce wages, or take other punitive measures against an employee without justifiable cause.&#8221; This provision applies to all businesses with 5 or more employees in South Korea. Whether a termination is &#8220;wrongful&#8221; depends not on its formal appearance but on its substantive reality.<\/p>\n<h3>Types of Termination<\/h3>\n<p>Korean law recognizes three main categories of termination: ordinary dismissal (based on employee misconduct), disciplinary dismissal (for violations of workplace rules), and managerial dismissal (economic layoffs under Article 24). Regardless of type, the principle of &#8220;substance over form&#8221; applies\u2014which becomes evident in the two contrasting cases we will examine.<\/p>\n<h3>Common Types of Wrongful Termination<\/h3>\n<p>First, dismissals with procedural defects. When an employer fails to provide written notice of termination stating the reasons and effective date, or terminates without the required 30-day advance notice, the dismissal is procedurally defective. Written notification of termination grounds and timing is mandatory under Korean law.<\/p>\n<p>Second, disguised economic layoffs. Layoffs for business reasons must be supported by genuine evidence of restructuring necessity. The employer must notify and consult with employee representatives at least 50 days in advance. Failure to comply renders the dismissal wrongful.<\/p>\n<p>Third, discriminatory or retaliatory dismissals. Terminating an employee for union membership, filing grievances, or reporting violations to labor authorities constitutes wrongful termination. Additionally, employees cannot be dismissed during medical leave for work-related injuries (and 30 days thereafter) or during maternity leave (and 30 days thereafter).<\/p>\n<p>Fourth, disguised contract expiration. When fixed-term employment contracts have been repeatedly renewed to the point of establishing a de facto permanent employment relationship, using formal contract expiration as grounds for termination may constitute wrongful dismissal.<\/p>\n<h3>When Termination Is Not Wrongful<\/h3>\n<p>Conversely, termination may be justified when the employee has committed serious misconduct: disclosure of confidential information, refusal to perform contractual duties, intentional damage to company property, repeated unauthorized absences, persistent poor work attitude, workplace violence, or defamation. However, mere performance deficiency alone is generally insufficient to justify dismissal, and the principle of proportionality must be observed.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section2\">2. Can a Coerced Resignation Be Considered Wrongful Termination? &#8211; Employee Victory Case<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. The Supreme Court of Korea ruled that when a resignation letter is submitted not based on the employee&#8217;s genuine intent but under employer coercion or pressure, it constitutes unilateral termination by the employer\u2014equivalent to wrongful dismissal.<\/p>\n<h3>Case Background<\/h3>\n<p>Ms. A was an executive at a private company. She was suddenly called to a meeting and pressured by senior management to resign. Over just five days, she was subjected to repeated pressure. On the fourth day, exhausted and under intense duress, she submitted a resignation letter. She then filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation that her termination was invalid.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Judgment<\/h3>\n<p>Courts at all levels\u2014from the trial court to the Supreme Court\u2014ruled in favor of the employee. The Supreme Court established this key principle: &#8220;Even when a resignation letter exists formally, if the employer made the decision to terminate and the employee merely submitted the document in response to pressure rather than genuine voluntary intent, it constitutes unilateral termination by the employer.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Decisive Factors<\/h3>\n<p>The court emphasized three critical elements. First, the nature and circumstances of the resignation solicitation\u2014including whether undue pressure, threats, or disadvantageous treatment was involved. Second, whether the employee genuinely expressed intent to resign during the process. Third, the employee&#8217;s response after submitting the resignation letter. In this case, Ms. A filed an objection immediately after submission, clearly demonstrating that she had no genuine intent to resign.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section3\">3. Is Dismissal for Hiring Irregularities Justified? &#8211; Employer Victory Case<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court ruled that when an employee actively participated in hiring irregularities that substantially undermined the fairness of the recruitment process, dismissal based on those grounds is justified\u2014even if criminal charges related to the same conduct resulted in acquittal.<\/p>\n<h3>Case Background<\/h3>\n<p>Mr. B was hired as a mid-career employee at a public institution. Years later, an investigation revealed irregularities in the hiring process, and Mr. B was dismissed. Although he was acquitted in criminal proceedings, he lost his wrongful termination lawsuit. He was found to have actively participated in the hiring irregularities.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Judgment<\/h3>\n<p>From the trial court to the Supreme Court, all courts ruled in favor of the employer. The Supreme Court emphasized: &#8220;The criminal acquittal and the labor dispute have different scopes of review and apply different legal principles. A criminal acquittal does not preclude finding just cause for dismissal under labor law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Separation of Criminal and Civil Judgments<\/h3>\n<p>This case illustrates an important principle. Criminal trials determine whether specific elements of a crime have been proven &#8220;beyond reasonable doubt.&#8221; In contrast, wrongful termination lawsuits examine whether there is &#8220;just cause&#8221; under the Labor Standards Act, applying a &#8220;preponderance of evidence&#8221; standard. Consequently, conduct that does not meet criminal standards may still constitute sufficient grounds for dismissal under labor law.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section4\">4. What Are the Key Differences Between the Two Rulings?<\/h2>\n<h3>Comparative Analysis<\/h3>\n<div class=\"case-comparison\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 20px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<h4>Key Issues Compared<\/h4>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Category<\/th>\n<th>Case A (Employee Victory)<\/th>\n<th>Case B (Employer Victory)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Formal Appearance<\/td>\n<td>Resignation letter submitted (voluntary resignation)<\/td>\n<td>Dismissal order (termination)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Substantive Finding<\/td>\n<td>Employer&#8217;s unilateral intent to terminate<\/td>\n<td>Just cause for dismissal existed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Employee Fault<\/td>\n<td>None<\/td>\n<td>Active participation in hiring irregularities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Employer Conduct<\/td>\n<td>5 days of intensive resignation pressure<\/td>\n<td>Dismissal pursuant to personnel regulations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Outcome<\/td>\n<td>Dismissal invalid, reinstatement ordered<\/td>\n<td>Dismissal valid, claim dismissed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<h3>The Substance-Over-Form Principle in Both Directions<\/h3>\n<p>Both cases applied Korean labor law&#8217;s fundamental principle of prioritizing substance over form\u2014but in opposite directions. In Case A, although a resignation letter existed formally, the substance was wrongful termination, benefiting the employee. In Case B, although there was a criminal acquittal, the substantive hiring misconduct existed, benefiting the employer.<\/p>\n<h3>Higher Standards for Public Institutions<\/h3>\n<p>In Case B, the court emphasized the special nature of public institutions: &#8220;Public institutions are established to serve the public interest and operate based on public trust, thus requiring higher standards for hiring fairness than private companies.&#8221; This means public sector employees must adhere to stricter ethical standards in hiring and personnel matters. In contrast, cases involving coerced resignation at private companies, like Case A, focus on whether the employer had intent to terminate and whether the employee genuinely intended to resign.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section5\">5. What Remedies Are Available for Wrongful Termination in South Korea?<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>Employees who have been wrongfully terminated in South Korea can file a remedy application with the Labor Relations Commission or bring a lawsuit in civil court seeking confirmation of dismissal invalidity. These procedures serve similar purposes but differ in nature, and employees may choose one or pursue both simultaneously.<\/p>\n<h3>Labor Relations Commission Remedy Application<\/h3>\n<p>Under Article 28 of the Labor Standards Act, wrongfully terminated employees may file for remedy with the Labor Relations Commission. This is an administrative remedy procedure where the Commission may order reinstatement and back pay. However, the application must be filed within 3 months of the termination date\u2014this is a strict deadline (exclusion period), and missing it means the remedy application itself becomes impossible.<\/p>\n<h3>Dismissal Invalidity Confirmation Lawsuit (Civil Court)<\/h3>\n<p>A dismissal invalidity confirmation lawsuit asks the court to declare that the employer&#8217;s unilateral termination has no legal effect. Classified as a declaratory action under civil procedure law, it is filed when the employee seeks to confirm the dismissal was invalid and restore the employment relationship. There is no specific limitation period, but filing too late may result in dismissal based on the good faith doctrine.<\/p>\n<h3>Relationship Between the Two Procedures<\/h3>\n<p>Employees may choose one or pursue both procedures simultaneously. However, if a civil court issues a final judgment that &#8220;the dismissal was justified,&#8221; the benefit of the Commission remedy procedure is extinguished. The choice between these routes should be made after consulting with a legal expert, considering the nature of the case, available evidence, and time constraints.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section6\">6. What Is the Procedure for a Dismissal Invalidity Lawsuit?<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>Dismissal invalidity lawsuits in South Korea follow standard civil procedure: filing the complaint, defendant&#8217;s answer, trial proceedings and evidence examination, and judgment. If the dismissal is confirmed invalid, the employee is entitled to reinstatement and may claim back wages for the period of wrongful termination.<\/p>\n<h3>Litigation Procedure<\/h3>\n<p>The terminated employee files a complaint with the competent court, specifying the termination date, grounds, and procedural defects. Once the court serves the complaint on the employer, the employer files an answer asserting the justification for termination. The court then examines evidence including employment contracts, personnel records, disciplinary committee minutes, emails, and recordings, ultimately rendering judgment on the legitimacy of the dismissal and procedural compliance.<\/p>\n<h3>Burden of Proof<\/h3>\n<p>A crucial aspect of dismissal invalidity lawsuits is the allocation of burden of proof. It is not the employee who must prove the termination was unjust\u2014rather, the employer must prove the termination was for just cause. The Supreme Court has consistently held: &#8220;The burden of proving just cause for dismissal rests with the employer.&#8221; Therefore, employees should specifically allege the circumstances and procedural defects of the termination, while the employer must demonstrate that the grounds meet the standard of social acceptability.<\/p>\n<h3>Effect of Judgment &#8211; Reinstatement<\/h3>\n<p>When the court rules that the dismissal is invalid, the employee&#8217;s employment relationship prior to termination is restored. The dismissal is void retroactively, obligating the employer to reinstate the employee to their original position. However, if the company has ceased operations or the employee has reached retirement age, monetary compensation equivalent to wages during the termination period may be awarded instead of reinstatement.<\/p>\n<h3>Effect of Judgment &#8211; Back Wages<\/h3>\n<p>Upon receiving a judgment of dismissal invalidity, the employee may claim wages for the period they were unable to work. Under Article 538 of the Korean Civil Code, wage obligations that arose from the employer&#8217;s refusal to accept work continue to exist. However, if the employee earned income from other employment during the termination period, the employer may deduct amounts exceeding the leave allowance level (70% of average wages).<\/p>\n<h3>Caution Regarding Good Faith Doctrine<\/h3>\n<p>If an employee accepts severance pay without objection after termination or files suit after a considerable delay, the court may find that the employee effectively acknowledged the termination and reject the claim under the good faith doctrine. Therefore, when contesting a termination, it is important to indicate &#8220;under protest&#8221; when receiving severance, or to document objections through email or certified mail immediately after termination.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section7\">7. What Should Employees and Employers Keep in Mind?<\/h2>\n<h3>Key Answer<\/h3>\n<p>In wrongful termination disputes in South Korea, the substantive reality matters more than formal appearances. For employees, securing evidence of coerced resignation is crucial. For employers, preparing objective documentation that proves the justification for termination is essential.<\/p>\n<h3>Points for Employees<\/h3>\n<p>If you are being pressured to resign, create written records immediately. Document the conversations during resignation solicitation, and preserve any evidence of threats or pressure. Even if you write a resignation letter, add a note such as &#8220;written at company&#8217;s request&#8221; or file an objection immediately after submission. You should file a remedy application with the Labor Relations Commission or initiate a lawsuit within 3 months of receiving termination notice.<\/p>\n<p>Importantly, avoid submitting a resignation letter if possible. Submitting one can significantly disadvantage your wrongful termination claim. Additionally, make copies of your employment contract and other documents, gather evidence about the circumstances and events, and secure witnesses if necessary.<\/p>\n<h3>Points for Employers<\/h3>\n<p>Termination requires both just cause and proper procedure. For disciplinary dismissal, ensure strict compliance with procedural requirements: proper composition of the disciplinary committee, providing the employee an opportunity to defend themselves, and written notification. Public institutions especially must follow all procedures specified in personnel regulations and relevant laws, and must secure objective evidence of the grounds for dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>Since the burden of proving just cause rests with the employer in dismissal invalidity lawsuits, active preparation is essential. If you implemented justified personnel action but face a lawsuit, you need personnel records and evidence of reasonable grounds. When conducting economic layoffs, carefully verify compliance with legal requirements. If the legitimacy of discipline is unclear, review disciplinary procedures and the proportionality principle. If disputes arise repeatedly, consider revising your discipline and termination manuals.<\/p>\n<h3>Evidence Checklist for Employees<\/h3>\n<p>Winning a wrongful termination dispute requires systematic evidence collection. Review these points step by step.<\/p>\n<p>First, verify the termination notification method. Termination must be communicated in writing (Article 27 of the Labor Standards Act), so secure emails, text messages, or notification letters. Second, examine whether the grounds for dismissal meet the standard of &#8220;making it difficult to maintain the employment relationship&#8221; under social norms. Third, check procedural legitimacy\u2014whether the disciplinary committee was properly convened and whether you were given an opportunity to explain.<\/p>\n<p>Fourth, review your employment contract and work rules to verify the company followed prescribed termination procedures. Fifth, create records of your post-termination response through emails, text messages, or certified mail documenting your objections. Sixth, be cautious when receiving severance pay\u2014accepting it without noting &#8220;under protest&#8221; may be interpreted as acknowledging the termination. Seventh, document any employment and income during the termination period (relevant for interim earnings deduction). Eighth, gather as much evidence as possible: personnel orders, meeting minutes, attendance records, messenger conversations.<\/p>\n<h3>Advice for Dispute Prevention<\/h3>\n<p>Establishing transparent and fair procedures from the hiring stage is important. Personnel regulations should clearly define grounds and procedures for termination and adequately communicate these to employees. When problems arise, consulting with a legal expert immediately to minimize legal risks is advisable. Based on experience handling numerous similar cases, early response often has a decisive impact on the final outcome.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- FAQ Section --><br \/>\n    <\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section8\">8. FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-section\" style=\"padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin: 30px 0; background-color: #f5f5f5;\">\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q1. Can a resignation letter still be considered wrongful termination in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. The Korean Supreme Court has ruled that even when a resignation letter exists formally, if it was written under employer coercion or pressure without the employee&#8217;s genuine intent, it is treated as unilateral termination by the employer\u2014equivalent to wrongful dismissal. The key issue is whether the employee had a &#8220;genuine intent to resign.&#8221; Courts examine the resignation solicitation process, circumstances of writing the resignation letter, and the employee&#8217;s behavior after submission.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q2. Can an employer dismiss an employee for hiring irregularities discovered later?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Dismissal for hiring irregularities is only justified when the misconduct substantially undermined the fairness of the hiring process. Mere procedural defects are insufficient. Courts consider whether the employee actively participated in the irregularities, whether other candidates&#8217; fair opportunities were compromised, the time elapsed before dismissal, and the severity of the misconduct.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q3. Does a criminal acquittal automatically invalidate a dismissal in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Not necessarily. Criminal and labor proceedings apply different standards of proof. Criminal trials require proof &#8220;beyond reasonable doubt,&#8221; while dismissal validity lawsuits examine whether &#8220;just cause&#8221; exists under the Labor Standards Act using the &#8220;preponderance of evidence&#8221; standard. Therefore, a criminal acquittal does not automatically make the dismissal wrongful.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q4. Should I file with the Labor Relations Commission or go to court?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. You may pursue one or both procedures simultaneously. Labor Relations Commission applications must be filed within 3 months of termination and proceed relatively quickly. Court lawsuits have no deadline but take longer. However, if a court issues a final judgment that the dismissal was justified, the Commission remedy becomes moot. Consider the nature of your case and available evidence when deciding, preferably after consulting with a legal professional.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q5. What is the deadline for filing a wrongful termination remedy in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Employees must file a remedy application with the Labor Relations Commission within 3 months of termination (Article 28 of the Labor Standards Act). This is an exclusion period\u2014missing it means the application itself becomes impossible. Court lawsuits to confirm dismissal invalidity, however, have no specific deadline or statute of limitations as declaratory actions. However, filing too late may be rejected under the good faith doctrine, and wage\/severance claims are subject to a 3-year statute of limitations, so prompt action is important.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q6. Who bears the burden of proof in wrongful termination cases?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. The employer bears the burden of proving that the termination was for just cause. The employee does not need to prove the termination was unjust\u2014rather, the employer must prove that grounds for dismissal existed and that they meet the standard of social acceptability. Therefore, employees should specifically allege the circumstances and procedural defects of the termination while securing relevant evidence.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q7. Does accepting severance pay waive my wrongful termination claim?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Not automatically. However, accepting severance without objection and filing suit much later may be rejected by the court under the good faith doctrine. Therefore, if you intend to contest the termination, indicate &#8220;under protest&#8221; when receiving severance, or document your objections through email or certified mail immediately after termination.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q8. Can a CEO claim wrongful termination in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Generally, CEOs are classified as employers, not employees, under Korean labor law. Therefore, removal by shareholders&#8217; resolution is not subject to wrongful termination protections under the Labor Standards Act. However, if special circumstances show the CEO was substantially subordinate to and provided labor for the company, worker status might be recognized\u2014though proving this is difficult.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q9. Is there a statute of limitations for severance pay claims in South Korea?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Yes. Severance pay claims expire 3 years from the date of termination. If not claimed within 3 years after leaving the company, the legal right is extinguished. While dismissal invalidity lawsuits have no specific deadline, severance and wage claims are subject to this separate statute of limitations, so caution is needed.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<div class=\"faq-question\">Q10. Is immediate termination without notice wrongful termination?<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-answer\">A. Employers must provide at least 30 days&#8217; advance notice before termination, or pay at least 30 days&#8217; ordinary wages as dismissal notice allowance. Termination violating this requirement has procedural defects and may be deemed wrongful termination even if grounds for dismissal exist. However, immediate termination without notice is permitted when the employee has committed serious misconduct.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>    <!-- Experience Statement --><\/p>\n<p>Based on extensive experience handling wrongful termination cases in South Korea, the legality of dismissal is determined by substance, not form. Whether employee or employer, accurately understanding the applicable legal principles and securing appropriate evidence in the early stages of a dispute has a decisive impact on the outcome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\" style=\"margin: 20px 0;\">\u203b The cases introduced in this article are based on actual Supreme Court rulings but have been anonymized to protect the parties&#8217; privacy.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- Author Box --><\/p>\n<div class=\"author-box\" style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 0; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 2px solid #722f37;\">\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<div class=\"author-name\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Corporate Advisory, Corporate Disputes, White-Collar Criminal Defense<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Former Prosecutor | 33rd Class, Judicial Research and Training Institute<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Korea University (LL.B., LL.M. in Criminal Law), UC Davis School of Law (LL.M.)<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/        \n\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        atlaw.kr&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener noreferrer&#8221;>Visit Atlas Law Firm Website<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents 1. What Is Wrongful Termination Under Korean Labor Law? 2. Can a Coerced Resignation Be Considered Wrongful Termination? &#8211; Employee Victory Case 3. Is Dismissal for Hiring Irregularities Justified? &#8211; Employer Victory Case 4. What Are the Key Differences Between the Two Rulings? 5. What Remedies Are Available for Wrongful Termination in&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,218,223,690],"tags":[340,342,339,341,338],"class_list":["post-338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil","category-corporate-counseling","category-corporate-disputes","category-employment-labor","tag-employee-dismissal","tag-employment-law-korea","tag-korean-labor-law","tag-labor-standards-act","tag-wrongful-termination-korea"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &amp; Employer Guide | Atlas Legal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &amp; Employer Guide | Atlas Legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18\ubd84\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &#038; Employer Guide\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3271,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"employee dismissal\",\"employment law Korea\",\"Korean labor law\",\"Labor Standards Act\",\"wrongful termination Korea\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil\\\/Administrative\",\"Corporate Counseling\",\"Corporate Disputes\",\"Employment &amp; Labor\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/\",\"name\":\"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee & Employer Guide | Atlas Legal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &#038; Employer Guide\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee & Employer Guide | Atlas Legal","description":"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee & Employer Guide | Atlas Legal","og_description":"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04":"18\ubd84"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &#038; Employer Guide","datePublished":"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/"},"wordCount":3271,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["employee dismissal","employment law Korea","Korean labor law","Labor Standards Act","wrongful termination Korea"],"articleSection":["Civil\/Administrative","Corporate Counseling","Corporate Disputes","Employment &amp; Labor"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/","name":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee & Employer Guide | Atlas Legal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-01-10T22:54:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T08:41:59+00:00","description":"Wrongful termination in South Korea explained. Learn legal standards, remedies, and litigation procedures under Korean labor law for employees and employers.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wrongful-termination-in-south-korea-employee-employer-guide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wrongful Termination in South Korea: Employee &#038; Employer Guide"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d4c25916239244225f5f853b2ddf50fdcb7ea24d63347445261fe71c707cc558?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1010,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338\/revisions\/1010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}