{"id":154,"date":"2025-07-20T02:47:13","date_gmt":"2025-07-20T02:47:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?p=154"},"modified":"2026-06-18T11:07:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T11:07:56","slug":"korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/","title":{"rendered":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_START -->\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"x-default\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/\" \/>\n<!-- ATLAS_HREFLANG_END --><br \/>\n<!-- ATLAS_SEO_BLOCK_START --><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/#article\",\"headline\":\"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service\",\"description\":\"Korea-China judicial cooperation A to Z \u2014 practical guide from evidence to enforcement.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-20\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03\",\"author\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\",\"name\":\"Taejin Kim\",\"jobTitle\":\"Managing Partner\",\"worksFor\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\"}},\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/home-en\/\"},\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/\"},\"about\":[\"Korea-China judicial cooperation\",\"Korea-China MLAT (mutual legal assistance treaty)\",\"Cross-border evidence collection\",\"Korea-China judgment recognition\"]}<\/script><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/#faq\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Where is Atlas Legal located?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal is located at B-2901, Centroad, 323 Incheontower-daero, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon (Songdo International Business District, IFEZ). Postal code 22007.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What languages does Atlas Legal serve clients in?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal serves clients in Korean and English. We routinely advise foreign-invested companies based in Songdo, Cheongna, and Yeongjong International Cities (IFEZ).\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What practice areas does Atlas Legal cover?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Atlas Legal advises on Korean corporate law, shareholder and director disputes, international contracts under Korean law, corporate rehabilitation and bankruptcy under the Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, criminal defense for corporate matters, and trade secret protection.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How can a foreign-invested company in Songdo IFEZ contact Atlas Legal?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Foreign-invested companies in Songdo, Cheongna, or Yeongjong International Cities can contact Atlas Legal at +82-32-864-8300 or info@atlaw.kr. Office hours are Monday to Friday, 09:00-18:00 KST.\"}}]}<\/script><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":[\"LegalService\",\"Service\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/#legalservice\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal\",\"alternateName\":[\"Atlas Law Firm\",\"Atlas Legal (formerly K&P)\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/home-en\/\",\"telephone\":\"+82-32-864-8300\",\"email\":\"info@atlaw.kr\",\"priceRange\":\"\u20a9\u20a9\u20a9\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"streetAddress\":\"323 Incheontower-daero, B-2901 (Songdo-dong, Centroad)\",\"addressLocality\":\"Yeonsu-gu, Incheon\",\"addressRegion\":\"Incheon Metropolitan City\",\"postalCode\":\"22007\",\"addressCountry\":\"KR\"},\"geo\":{\"@type\":\"GeoCoordinates\",\"latitude\":37.399438,\"longitude\":126.629812},\"openingHoursSpecification\":[{\"@type\":\"OpeningHoursSpecification\",\"dayOfWeek\":[\"Monday\",\"Tuesday\",\"Wednesday\",\"Thursday\",\"Friday\"],\"opens\":\"09:00\",\"closes\":\"18:00\"}],\"areaServed\":[{\"@type\":\"Country\",\"name\":\"South Korea\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Incheon Metropolitan City\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Seoul Special City\"},{\"@type\":\"AdministrativeArea\",\"name\":\"Gyeonggi Province\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Songdo International Business District (IFEZ)\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Cheongna International City (IFEZ)\"},{\"@type\":\"Place\",\"name\":\"Yeongjong International City (IFEZ)\"}],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Korean corporate law\",\"Korean Commercial Act\",\"Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act\",\"International contracts under Korean law\",\"Songdo IFEZ business legal services\"],\"knowsLanguage\":[\"en\",\"ko\"],\"founder\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/taejin-kim-en\/#person\"}}<\/script><!-- ATLAS_SEO_BLOCK_END --><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-container\">\n<div class=\"toc\">\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#introduction\">Introduction: Importance and Current Status of Korea-China Judicial Cooperation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#legal-framework\">Legal Framework: Foundation of Bilateral Judicial Cooperation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#evidence-cooperation\">Evidence Collection Cooperation: Practical Application of Dual Treaty System<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#legal-information\">Legal Information Provision: New Areas of Mutual Cooperation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#document-service\">Document Service Cooperation: Procedures and Practical Issues<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#practical-considerations\">Practical Considerations: Treaty Selection and Utilization Strategies<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#conclusion\">Conclusion: Recommendations for Effective Judicial Cooperation<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"introduction\">Introduction: Importance and Current Status of Korea-China Judicial Cooperation<\/h2>\n<p>As economic exchanges between Korea and China have rapidly expanded, the necessity for judicial cooperation in legal disputes between the two countries has significantly increased. Civil judicial cooperation plays a crucial role in cross-border legal procedures and is classified in various ways according to its scope and nature.<\/p>\n<div class=\"highlight-box\">\n<h4>Classification of Judicial Cooperation<\/h4>\n<p><strong>Broad Definition<\/strong>: All forms of judicial cooperation activities conducted at the international level<\/p>\n<p><strong>Narrow Definition<\/strong>: Legal cooperation between nations regarding document service and evidence collection<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h3>Legal Foundation of Bilateral Judicial Cooperation<\/h3>\n<p>Korea-China judicial cooperation operates on the following legal foundations:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Bilateral Treaties<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Korea-China Civil and Commercial Judicial Cooperation Treaty (concluded in 2003, effective in 2005)<\/li>\n<li>Establishment of comprehensive judicial cooperation framework<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Multilateral Treaties<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Hague Conference on Private International Law treaties<\/li>\n<li>Specialized regulations for specific fields<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Domestic Legal Basis<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Korea: International Civil Judicial Cooperation Act, Civil Procedure Act<\/li>\n<li>China: Civil Procedure Law, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Systematic Classification of Judicial Cooperation Areas<\/h3>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Classification Criteria<\/th>\n<th>Korean Approach<\/th>\n<th>Chinese Approach<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>System Structure<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Integrated perspective<\/td>\n<td>Bifurcated classification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Included Areas<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Service, evidence collection, legal information provision<\/td>\n<td>General cooperation + Special cooperation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>General Cooperation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>&#8211;<\/td>\n<td>Service and evidence collection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Special Cooperation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>&#8211;<\/td>\n<td>Recognition and enforcement of judgments<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"legal-framework\">Legal Framework: Foundation of Bilateral Judicial Cooperation<\/h2>\n<p>Korea-China judicial cooperation operates under a complex treaty system, and it is crucial for practitioners to accurately understand the characteristics and scope of application of each treaty.<\/p>\n<h3>Structural Characteristics of the Treaty System<\/h3>\n<div class=\"highlight-box\">\n<h4>Features of the Dual Treaty System<\/h4>\n<p>Korea and China have a unique structure that simultaneously applies bilateral and multilateral treaties. This brings the effect of maximizing the advantages of each treaty while complementing their shortcomings.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h3>Unique Position of Bilateral Treaties<\/h3>\n<p>The Korea-China Treaty has the following special significance:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Comprehensiveness<\/strong>: Includes service, evidence collection, and legal information provision<\/li>\n<li><strong>Practicality<\/strong>: Customized provisions tailored to the circumstances of both countries<\/li>\n<li><strong>Complementarity<\/strong>: Plays a role in complementing the limitations of Hague treaties<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Relationship with Hague Treaties<\/h3>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Specialized Area<\/th>\n<th>Scope of Application<\/th>\n<th>Characteristics<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Service Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Document service<\/td>\n<td>Judicial\/extrajudicial documents<\/td>\n<td>Wide range of service options<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Evidence Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Evidence collection<\/td>\n<td>Overall evidence investigation<\/td>\n<td>Various evidence collection methods<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Comprehensive cooperation<\/td>\n<td>Overall judicial cooperation<\/td>\n<td>Country-specific provisions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"evidence-cooperation\">Evidence Collection Cooperation: Practical Application of Dual Treaty System<\/h2>\n<h3>Basic Framework of Evidence Collection Cooperation<\/h3>\n<p>Evidence collection between Korea and China has a complex structure with multiple applicable treaties:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Applicable Treaties<\/strong>: Korea-China Treaty and Hague Evidence Convention<\/li>\n<li><strong>Accession Process<\/strong>: Korea&#8217;s accession to the Hague Evidence Convention (2010) came after the Korea-China Treaty (2005)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Common Policy<\/strong>: Both countries reject letters rogatory for pre-trial discovery purposes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"warning-box\">\n<h4>Important Note<\/h4>\n<p>Both countries have civil law legal systems, taking a different approach from the extensive discovery procedures of common law systems.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h3>Special Significance of Investigation Requests to Public Offices<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Comparison of Treaty Provisions<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Public Office Investigation Provisions<\/th>\n<th>Practical Applicability<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Explicit provisions exist (Articles 16, 17)<\/td>\n<td>Directly applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Evidence Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2717 No separate provisions<\/td>\n<td>Difficult to utilize<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Practical Importance<\/strong>: When fact-finding from public offices is necessary, utilizing the Korea-China Treaty is much more effective.<\/p>\n<h3>Evidence Collection through Diplomatic and Consular Officers<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Structure of Chapter 2 of the Hague Evidence Convention<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Article 15<\/strong>: Evidence taking in respect of nationals<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 16<\/strong>: Evidence taking in respect of nationals of the State of execution or third States<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 17<\/strong>: Evidence taking by commissioners<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Reservation Status of Both Countries<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Country<\/th>\n<th>Article 15 Application<\/th>\n<th>Article 16 Application<\/th>\n<th>Article 17 Application<\/th>\n<th>Actual Scope of Utilization<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Accepted<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Rejected<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Rejected<\/td>\n<td>Limited to nationals<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>China<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Accepted<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Rejected<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Rejected<\/td>\n<td>Limited to nationals<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Complementary Provisions of the Korea-China Treaty<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Significance of Article 24<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Allows evidence taking from nationals through diplomatic or consular officers of one contracting party<\/li>\n<li>Similar effect to the Hague Evidence Convention<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Recognition of Privilege Against Evidence Production<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Approaches by Treaty<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Recognition of Privilege<\/th>\n<th>Procedural Requirements<\/th>\n<th>Practical Features<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Evidence Convention Article 11<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Recognized<\/td>\n<td>Must be specified in letter rogatory or confirmed by authorities<\/td>\n<td>Procedural strictness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty Article 21<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Recognized<\/td>\n<td>No special restrictions<\/td>\n<td>Procedural flexibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Practical Evaluation<\/strong>: Due to the nature of bilateral treaties, the Korea-China Treaty provides a more flexible and practical approach.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-information\">Legal Information Provision: New Areas of Mutual Cooperation<\/h2>\n<h3>Establishment of Legal Information Provision System<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Procedural Structure<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Request Stage<\/strong>: Requesting State&#8217;s central authority sends request<\/li>\n<li><strong>Receipt Stage<\/strong>: Requested State&#8217;s central authority receives request<\/li>\n<li><strong>Investigation Stage<\/strong>: Collection of relevant laws and practical information<\/li>\n<li><strong>Response Stage<\/strong>: Provision of collected information<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Scope and Content of Provided Information<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Treaty Basis Articles<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Article 3<\/strong>: General cooperation obligations<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 26<\/strong>: Specific procedures for legal information provision<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Available Information<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Legal Information<\/strong>:\n<ul>\n<li>Content of written laws<\/li>\n<li>Interpretation of laws<\/li>\n<li>Related subordinate regulations<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Practical Information<\/strong>:\n<ul>\n<li>Court precedent trends<\/li>\n<li>Practical operation of administrative agencies<\/li>\n<li>Actual operation of legal procedures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Differences from Hague Treaties<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Comparison by Treaty Type<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Legal Information Provision<\/th>\n<th>Nature of Treaty<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Explicit provisions<\/td>\n<td>Comprehensive judicial cooperation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Service Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2717 No provisions<\/td>\n<td>Service-specialized<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Evidence Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2717 No provisions<\/td>\n<td>Evidence collection-specialized<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Challenges for Enhancing Effectiveness<\/h3>\n<div class=\"warning-box\">\n<h4>Current Problems<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Procedural Ambiguity<\/strong>: Absence of specific implementation methods<\/li>\n<li><strong>Low Utilization<\/strong>: Lack of awareness in the legal community<\/li>\n<li><strong>Information Accessibility<\/strong>: Inadequate efficient information delivery system<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p><strong>Improvement Directions<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Standardized Procedures<\/strong>: Development of detailed practical manuals<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digital Platform<\/strong>: Establishment of online information exchange system<\/li>\n<li><strong>Regular Updates<\/strong>: Systematic regular information update framework<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2 id=\"document-service\">Document Service Cooperation: Procedures and Practical Issues<\/h2>\n<h3>Basic System and Principles of Service<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Dual Treaty System<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Applicable Treaties<\/strong>: Korea-China Treaty and Hague Service Convention<\/li>\n<li><strong>Membership Status<\/strong>: Both countries are parties to the Hague Service Convention<\/li>\n<li><strong>Application Area<\/strong>: Joint regulation of judicial document service<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Operating Principles<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Service Method<\/strong>: Both countries commonly adopt official service system<\/li>\n<li><strong>Procedural System<\/strong>: Central authority transmission system as basic framework<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Development of Central Authority System<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Innovative Contribution of the Korea-China Treaty<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Central Authority Function<\/th>\n<th>Innovation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Receiving + Transmitting authority<\/td>\n<td>Dual function performance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Hague Service Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Receiving authority only<\/td>\n<td>Single function<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Practical Service Procedure<\/strong> (Korea \u2192 China):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Competent Court<\/strong> decides on service commission<\/li>\n<li><strong>Chief Judge<\/strong> approval procedure<\/li>\n<li>Transmission through <strong>Korean Central Authority<\/strong> (Court Administration)<\/li>\n<li>Delivery to <strong>Chinese Central Authority<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Chinese Relevant Court<\/strong> executes service<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div class=\"warning-box\">\n<h4>Practical Constraints<\/h4>\n<p><strong>Ministry of Foreign Affairs Transmission Issue<\/strong>: Transmission through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is still required under Korean International Civil Judicial Cooperation Act, causing procedural delays<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h3>Scope of Application for Extrajudicial Document Service<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Differences in Treaty Application<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Document Classification<\/th>\n<th>Korea-China Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Hague Service Convention<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Judicial Documents<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Applicable<\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Extrajudicial Documents<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Not specified<\/td>\n<td>\u2713 Applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Practical Importance of Extrajudicial Documents<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Contract-related<\/strong>: Demand letters, contract termination notices<\/li>\n<li><strong>Real estate-related<\/strong>: Lease termination notices<\/li>\n<li><strong>Other legal notices<\/strong>: Demand letters, dunning notices, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"highlight-box\">\n<h4>Practical Recommendation<\/h4>\n<p>When extrajudicial document service is necessary, it must be conducted through the Hague Service Convention.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h3>Limitations of Simplified Service Methods<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Simplified Options under the Hague Service Convention<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Article 8<\/strong>: Direct service by diplomatic or consular agents<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 10<\/strong>:\n<ol>\n<li>Service by postal channels<\/li>\n<li>Direct service between judicial officers<\/li>\n<li>Other simplified service methods<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Restrictive Approach of Both Countries<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Article<\/th>\n<th>Content<\/th>\n<th>Korea-China Application<\/th>\n<th>Practical Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Article 8<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Direct service by diplomatic\/consular officers<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Reserved<\/td>\n<td>Cannot be utilized<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Article 10<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Simplified service methods<\/td>\n<td>\u2717 Reserved<\/td>\n<td>Cannot be utilized<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Areas Requiring Improvement<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Efficiency Issues<\/strong>: Fails to meet the speed requirements of modern international transactions<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost Issues<\/strong>: Increased service costs due to complex procedures<\/li>\n<li><strong>Time Issues<\/strong>: Extended periods due to multi-stage transmission<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Application of Special Provisions of the Service Convention<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Key Protective Clauses<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<h4>Article 15 &#8211; Permission for Default Proceedings<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Allows proceedings even when defendant defaults under certain conditions<\/li>\n<li>Permits proceedings even when certificate of service is not received<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Article 16 &#8211; Relief from Default Judgments<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Protective measures for defendants who received default judgments<\/li>\n<li>Provisions guaranteeing right of appeal<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Application Status by Treaty<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Treaty<\/th>\n<th>Article 15 Provisions<\/th>\n<th>Article 16 Provisions<\/th>\n<th>Interpretation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea-China Treaty<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No explicit provisions<\/td>\n<td>No explicit provisions<\/td>\n<td>Complementary application possible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Service Convention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Explicit provisions exist<\/td>\n<td>Explicit provisions exist<\/td>\n<td>Direct application<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Analysis of Actual Service Status<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Treaty Selection Patterns in Practice<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Korea \u2192 China<\/strong>: Preference for Korea-China Treaty<\/li>\n<li><strong>China \u2192 Korea<\/strong>:\n<ul>\n<li>Initially: Mainly utilized Hague Service Convention<\/li>\n<li>After 2014: Parallel use of Korea-China Treaty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Comparison of Consulate Utilization<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Country<\/th>\n<th>Own Consulate Utilization<\/th>\n<th>Practical Features<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Korea<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Active utilization<\/td>\n<td>Active role of Korean consulates in China<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>China<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Passive utilization<\/td>\n<td>Limited role of Chinese consulates in Korea<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"practical-considerations\">Practical Considerations: Treaty Selection and Utilization Strategies<\/h2>\n<h3>Basic Principles for Resolving Treaty Conflicts<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Conflict Prevention Provisions<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Korea-China Treaty Article 29<\/strong>: Principle of mutual non-interference<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hague Service Convention Article 25<\/strong>: Provision with same intent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Conflicting Interpretations<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Interpretation Method<\/th>\n<th>Basic Approach<\/th>\n<th>Advantages<\/th>\n<th>Disadvantages<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Priority Application Theory<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Priority application of Korea-China Treaty<\/td>\n<td>Legal clarity<\/td>\n<td>Lack of flexibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Mutual Complementarity Theory<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Harmonious interpretation of both treaties<\/td>\n<td>Practical flexibility<\/td>\n<td>Complexity of interpretation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Recommended Approach in Practice<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Adopt <strong>mutual complementary interpretation<\/strong> as basic principle<\/li>\n<li>Prioritize provisions favorable to <strong>promoting judicial cooperation<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Maximize efficiency through <strong>teleological interpretation<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Strategic Considerations for Treaty Selection<\/h3>\n<div class=\"highlight-box\">\n<h4>Selection Criteria<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Nature of Case<\/strong>: Judicial vs. extrajudicial documents<\/li>\n<li><strong>Urgency<\/strong>: Degree of procedural speed requirements<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost Efficiency<\/strong>: Consideration of service costs and time<\/li>\n<li><strong>Legal Safety<\/strong>: Certainty of service effectiveness<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<h3>Future-Oriented Improvement Directions<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Short-term Improvement Tasks<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Procedural Simplification<\/strong>: Elimination of unnecessary transmission stages<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digitalization<\/strong>: Introduction of electronic service methods<\/li>\n<li><strong>Standardization<\/strong>: Preparation of unified forms and procedures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Long-term Development Directions<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Treaty Amendment<\/strong>: Improvement of treaty provisions to match reality<\/li>\n<li><strong>Technology Utilization<\/strong>: Enhanced efficiency using IT technology<\/li>\n<li><strong>International Cooperation<\/strong>: Strengthening multilateral cooperation frameworks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"conclusion\">Conclusion: Recommendations for Effective Judicial Cooperation<\/h2>\n<p>Judicial cooperation between Korea and China continues to grow in importance alongside the expansion of economic exchanges between the two countries. While the current dual treaty system has its respective advantages, continuous improvement is necessary for efficient utilization in practice.<\/p>\n<h3>Major Achievements and Significance<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Systematic Foundation Building<\/strong>: Completion of comprehensive judicial cooperation system<\/li>\n<li><strong>Accumulation of Practical Experience<\/strong>: Building practical know-how through various cases<\/li>\n<li><strong>Securing Legal Stability<\/strong>: Establishment of predictable procedures and standards<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Future Tasks and Prospects<\/h3>\n<div class=\"warning-box\">\n<h4>Areas Requiring Improvement<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Procedural Efficiency<\/strong>: Simplification of complex transmission procedures<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digital Transformation<\/strong>: Introduction and utilization of electronic methods<\/li>\n<li><strong>Practitioner Education<\/strong>: Enhancement of understanding of treaty contents<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost Reduction<\/strong>: Rationalization of economic burden<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<h3>Recommendations for Practitioners<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Careful Treaty Selection<\/strong>: Choosing optimal treaties according to case characteristics<\/li>\n<li><strong>Importance of Procedural Compliance<\/strong>: Ensuring legal stability through accurate procedural implementation<\/li>\n<li><strong>Thorough Preparation<\/strong>: Complete preparation of necessary documents and information<\/li>\n<li><strong>Expert Utilization<\/strong>: Utilizing expert consultation for complex matters<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Korea-China judicial cooperation, as a key tool for resolving legal disputes between the two countries, is expected to continue developing into a more effective system through continuous development and improvement.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-top: 30px; border-left: 4px solid #722f37; font-family: Georgia, serif;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 20px; color: #2c3e50; font-weight: bold;\">About the Author<\/h3>\n<div style=\"font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; color: #333; margin-bottom: 5px;\">Taejin Kim | Managing Partner, Atlas Legal<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 5px; line-height: 1.4;\">Attorney specializing in Corporate Advisory, Corporate Disputes, Corporate Criminal Law<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 5px; line-height: 1.4;\">Former Prosecutor | 33rd Class of Judicial Research and Training Institute<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px; color: #555; margin-bottom: 15px; line-height: 1.4;\">Korea University LL.B, LL.M. in Criminal Law, University of California, Davis LL.M.<\/div>\n<div class=\"author-info\">Atlas Legal | Incheon Songdo, South Korea<\/div>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en\/kp-law-firm\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: inline-block; background-color: #722f37; color: white; padding: 12px 24px; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 6px; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; border: 2px solid #722f37; cursor: pointer; box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(114, 47, 55, 0.3); margin-top: 5px;\">Visit Atlas Legal Website<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents Introduction: Importance and Current Status of Korea-China Judicial Cooperation Legal Framework: Foundation of Bilateral Judicial Cooperation Evidence Collection Cooperation: Practical Application of Dual Treaty System Legal Information Provision: New Areas of Mutual Cooperation Document Service Cooperation: Procedures and Practical Issues Practical Considerations: Treaty Selection and Utilization Strategies Conclusion: Recommendations for Effective Judicial&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,220],"tags":[160,161,159,162,158],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corporate","category-intl-transactions","tag-document-service","tag-evidence-collection","tag-international-civil-litigation","tag-international-contract-disputes","tag-korea-china-judicial-cooperation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ko_KR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Atlas Legal Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10\ubd84\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\"},\"headline\":\"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1795,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"document service\",\"evidence collection\",\"international civil litigation\",\"international contract disputes\",\"Korea China judicial cooperation\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Corporate\\\/International\",\"Int'l Transactions&amp;Disputes\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/\",\"name\":\"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\ud648\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png\",\"width\":540,\"height\":485,\"caption\":\"Atlas Legal English Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55\",\"name\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ko-KR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/atlaw.kr\\\/en-blog\\\/author\\\/prinz001\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service","description":"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/","og_locale":"ko_KR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service","og_description":"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.","og_url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/","og_site_name":"Atlas Legal Blog","article_published_time":"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00","author":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\uae00\uc4f4\uc774":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","\uc608\uc0c1 \ub418\ub294 \ud310\ub3c5 \uc2dc\uac04":"10\ubd84"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/"},"author":{"name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55"},"headline":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service","datePublished":"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/"},"wordCount":1795,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["document service","evidence collection","international civil litigation","international contract disputes","Korea China judicial cooperation"],"articleSection":["Corporate\/International","Int'l Transactions&amp;Disputes"],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/","name":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-20T02:47:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-18T11:07:56+00:00","description":"Comprehensive guide to Korea-China judicial cooperation covering evidence collection, document service, and legal information provision. Expert attorney provides detailed practical insights for cross-border legal procedures.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ko-KR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/korea-china-judicial-cooperation-a-to-z-complete-practical-guide-from-evidence-collection-to-document-service\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\ud648","item":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Korea-China Judicial Cooperation A to Z: Complete Practical Guide from Evidence Collection to Document Service"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ko-KR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#organization","name":"Atlas Legal English Blog","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/\ud3f4\ub354-\uc0c1\ub2e8-\uc9c1\uc0ac\uac01\ud615.png","width":540,"height":485,"caption":"Atlas Legal English Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/184bcdecc06f89fd6c36b29781165b55","name":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ko-KR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f03bca99acfafded0c4fa1b01dee8839b10f831ccba39db4d9dc175f44d3d640?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\ubc95\ubb34\ubc95\uc778 \uc544\ud2c0\ub77c\uc2a4"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/atlaw.kr"],"url":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/author\/prinz001\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1345,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions\/1345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atlaw.kr\/en-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}